Re: [arch-general] defunct packages spooking around

2009-10-24 Thread Xavier
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 2:51 AM, Allan McRae wrote: > Allan McRae wrote: >> >> Although, all these should be detectable by "pacman -Qqtd" (maybe not >> libdownload as it was part of base). >> > > And remember always check "pacman -Qqtd" output before doing a "pacman -Rs > $(pacman -Qqtd)" > >>

Re: [arch-general] defunct packages spooking around

2009-10-23 Thread Allan McRae
Allan McRae wrote: Although, all these should be detectable by "pacman -Qqtd" (maybe not libdownload as it was part of base). And remember always check "pacman -Qqtd" output before doing a "pacman -Rs $(pacman -Qqtd)" > pacman -Qqtd aufs2 db4.1 esound evolution-data-server farsight2 gp

Re: [arch-general] defunct packages spooking around

2009-10-21 Thread Xavier
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Firmicus wrote: > That's what I guessed: termcap-compat has ~18%! > csup: 15% > and libdownload: 59%!! > > For the rest one would need to check each pkg under "unknown" for > non-existence in AUR... Any volunteer? :) > > I think you can automate that. One exampl

Re: [arch-general] defunct packages spooking around

2009-10-21 Thread Firmicus
Eric Bélanger a écrit : > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Firmicus wrote: > >> Eric Bélanger a écrit : >> >>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 5:39 AM, Firmicus wrote: >>> >>> Allan McRae a écrit : > Firmicus wrote: > > >> Hi folks, >

Re: [arch-general] defunct packages spooking around

2009-10-21 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Firmicus wrote: > Eric Bélanger a écrit : >> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 5:39 AM, Firmicus wrote: >> >>> Allan McRae a écrit : >>> Firmicus wrote: > Hi folks, > > Sorry for the halloweenish subject heading ;) > > I recently got this bug

Re: [arch-general] defunct packages spooking around

2009-10-21 Thread Firmicus
Eric Bélanger a écrit : > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 5:39 AM, Firmicus wrote: > >> Allan McRae a écrit : >> >>> Firmicus wrote: >>> Hi folks, Sorry for the halloweenish subject heading ;) I recently got this bug report: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16690

Re: [arch-general] defunct packages spooking around

2009-10-21 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 5:39 AM, Firmicus wrote: > Allan McRae a écrit : >> Firmicus wrote: >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> Sorry for the halloweenish subject heading ;) >>> >>> I recently got this bug report: >>> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16690 >>> >>> It turned out it was not a bug with the perl pack

Re: [arch-general] defunct packages spooking around

2009-10-21 Thread Firmicus
Allan McRae a écrit : > Firmicus wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> Sorry for the halloweenish subject heading ;) >> >> I recently got this bug report: >> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16690 >> >> It turned out it was not a bug with the perl package at all, but a >> problem which occurs when the presumably

Re: [arch-general] defunct packages spooking around

2009-10-21 Thread Allan McRae
Firmicus wrote: Hi folks, Sorry for the halloweenish subject heading ;) I recently got this bug report: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16690 It turned out it was not a bug with the perl package at all, but a problem which occurs when the presumably very old and no longer existing package "term

[arch-general] defunct packages spooking around

2009-10-21 Thread Firmicus
Hi folks, Sorry for the halloweenish subject heading ;) I recently got this bug report: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16690 It turned out it was not a bug with the perl package at all, but a problem which occurs when the presumably very old and no longer existing package "termcap-compat" is ins