2015-05-03 18:29 GMT+02:00 Doug Newgard :
>
> The only purpose they would serve would be someone running extremely out of
> date packages or trying to upgrade an extremely out of date system.
I don't think a system running a 2.6 kernel would be salvageable anyway.
The many filesystem, systemd, et
On Sun, 3 May 2015 18:15:54 +0200
Sebastiaan Lokhorst wrote:
> 2015-05-03 15:10 GMT+02:00 Doug Newgard :
> >
> > It's left over from when the package was named differently.
> >
>
> So they serve no purpose anymore, right?
>
> I have opened a bug report asking for them to be removed:
> https://b
2015-05-03 15:10 GMT+02:00 Doug Newgard :
>
> It's left over from when the package was named differently.
>
So they serve no purpose anymore, right?
I have opened a bug report asking for them to be removed:
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/44826
Thanks,
Sebastiaan
On Sun, 03 May 2015 12:52:36 +
Roman Rader wrote:
> Why https://www.archlinux.org/packages/core/x86_64/linux/ package provides
> kernel26 while current version is 4? Is it a mistake or 26 means something
> else?
>
> Roman
kernel26 = kernel 2.6. It's left over from when the package was named
Why https://www.archlinux.org/packages/core/x86_64/linux/ package provides
kernel26 while current version is 4? Is it a mistake or 26 means something
else?
Roman
5 matches
Mail list logo
