Le Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:56:24 -0600,
"David C. Rankin" a écrit :
> On Tuesday 17 November 2009 05:50:02 and regarding:
> > Am Dienstag 17 November 2009 12:22:35 schrieb tuxce:
> > > I'm uploading it right now, thanks for the information.
> >
> > You know that redistribution of the binary package
On Tuesday 17 November 2009 05:50:02 and regarding:
> Am Dienstag 17 November 2009 12:22:35 schrieb tuxce:
> > I'm uploading it right now, thanks for the information.
>
> You know that redistribution of the binary package is not legal? (except
> you have got the permission from Sun of course)
>
No, it is not actually...
2009/11/17 Ng Oon-Ee :
> On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 07:57 -0600, Dwight Schauer wrote:
>> Yeah, as soon as I saw this redistribution discussion updated right
>> away as I assumed it would soon be deleted.
>
> Honestly, is it THAT hard to compile it from the AUR?
>
>
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 07:57 -0600, Dwight Schauer wrote:
> Yeah, as soon as I saw this redistribution discussion updated right
> away as I assumed it would soon be deleted.
Honestly, is it THAT hard to compile it from the AUR?
Yeah, as soon as I saw this redistribution discussion updated right
away as I assumed it would soon be deleted.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 7:53 AM, tuxce wrote:
> 2009/11/17 Pierre Schmitz
>>
>> Am Dienstag 17 November 2009 12:22:35 schrieb tuxce:
>> > I'm uploading it right now, thanks for the inf
2009/11/17 Pierre Schmitz
>
> Am Dienstag 17 November 2009 12:22:35 schrieb tuxce:
> > I'm uploading it right now, thanks for the information.
> >
>
> You know that redistribution of the binary package is not legal? (except you
> have got the permission from Sun of course)
>
> --
>
> Pierre Schmit
Am Dienstag 17 November 2009 12:22:35 schrieb tuxce:
> I'm uploading it right now, thanks for the information.
>
You know that redistribution of the binary package is not legal? (except you
have got the permission from Sun of course)
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
2009/11/17 David C. Rankin
> Guys,
>
> The archlinuxfr server has a bad virtualbox package on it. There is a lot
> of
> things virtualbox is, but one thing it isn't is an 8 meg package:
>
> :: Retrieving packages from archlinuxfr...
> error: failed retrieving file 'virtualbox_bin-3.0.10-1-x86_64.
2009/11/17 David C. Rankin :
> Guys,
>
> The archlinuxfr server has a bad virtualbox package on it. There is a lot of
> things virtualbox is, but one thing it isn't is an 8 meg package:
>.
> Probably just a bad rsync...
The archlinux.fr repo isn't an official repository... You'd be better
off
Guys,
The archlinuxfr server has a bad virtualbox package on it. There is a lot of
things virtualbox is, but one thing it isn't is an 8 meg package:
:: Retrieving packages from archlinuxfr...
error: failed retrieving file 'virtualbox_bin-3.0.10-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.bz2'
from repo.archlinux.fr : Not
10 matches
Mail list logo
