On Wednesday 26 August 2009 01:43:37 pm Patrick Brisbin wrote:
> as a small aside; after being corrected a few times on bbs, i now know
> that
>
> pacman -Qqe | grep -vx "$(pacman -Qqm)" > pkg.list
>
> and
>
> cat pkg.list | xargs pacman -S --noconfirm --needed
>
> work the best for this.
Am Wed, 26 Aug 2009 19:25:07 +0300
schrieb Roman Kyrylych :
> 2009/8/26 Lukáš Jirkovský :
> >
> > What about putting date when pacman -Syu was run for a last time in
> > that file? It would still suffer from lag when using mirrors but I
> > guess it should be accurate enough.
>
> I don't think an
On 08/26/09 at 01:35pm, David C. Rankin wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 August 2009 03:19:30 am Nathan K. Bathory wrote:
> > >
> > > pacman -Q obviously not the answer, but whilst on that - is it
> > > possible to do a pacman -Q, save the output somewhere, then on
> > > another machine, just reverse the
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 03:19:30 am Nathan K. Bathory wrote:
> >
> > pacman -Q obviously not the answer, but whilst on that - is it
> > possible to do a pacman -Q, save the output somewhere, then on
> > another machine, just reverse the process? Would save me heaps of
> > time putting a system
2009/8/26 Lukáš Jirkovský :
>
> What about putting date when pacman -Syu was run for a last time in
> that file? It would still suffer from lag when using mirrors but I
> guess it should be accurate enough.
I don't think anyone is going to really put something in that file,
so don't hold your brea
2009/8/26 Aaron Griffin :
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 4:06 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Jan de Groot wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 10:40 +0200, Gerhard Brauer wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 26.08.2009, 09:56 +0200 schrieb Jan de Groot:
> As Arch is a rolli
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 4:06 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Jan de Groot wrote:
>> On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 10:40 +0200, Gerhard Brauer wrote:
>>> Am Mittwoch, den 26.08.2009, 09:56 +0200 schrieb Jan de Groot:
>>>
>>> > As Arch is a rolling release system, we decided to
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 10:40 +0200, Gerhard Brauer wrote:
>> Am Mittwoch, den 26.08.2009, 09:56 +0200 schrieb Jan de Groot:
>>
>> > As Arch is a rolling release system, we decided to remove the file. But
>> > as tools use this file to identify A
Gerhard Brauer schrieb:
Neat!
Or the percentage of our roadmap to world domination (BTW: i always
missed this in Roadmap on Flyspray)
It's not nearly complete. Right now, Arch runs on a very small
percentage of computers world-wide. We need at least 20% until we can
inject our world-domi
Am Mittwoch, den 26.08.2009, 10:52 +0200 schrieb Dieter Plaetinck:
>
> maybe we should put the output of `pacman -Q | sha1sum` in /etc/arch-release.
> git style! :P
Neat!
Or the percentage of our roadmap to world domination (BTW: i always
missed this in Roadmap on Flyspray)
> Dieter
Gerh
Am Mittwoch, den 26.08.2009, 10:45 +0200 schrieb Jan de Groot:
> On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 10:40 +0200, Gerhard Brauer wrote:
> >
> > To far this we could maybe add a function to pacman, so that after every
> > -Syu the unixtime gets written to this file.
> > This would give us:
> > * IMHO the highest
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:45:33 +0200
Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 10:40 +0200, Gerhard Brauer wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 26.08.2009, 09:56 +0200 schrieb Jan de Groot:
> >
> > > As Arch is a rolling release system, we decided to remove the
> > > file. But as tools use this file to i
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 10:40 +0200, Gerhard Brauer wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 26.08.2009, 09:56 +0200 schrieb Jan de Groot:
>
> > As Arch is a rolling release system, we decided to remove the file. But
> > as tools use this file to identify Arch systems, we decided to keep the
> > file, but make it
Am Mittwoch, den 26.08.2009, 09:56 +0200 schrieb Jan de Groot:
> As Arch is a rolling release system, we decided to remove the file. But
> as tools use this file to identify Arch systems, we decided to keep the
> file, but make it empty.
>
> 2009.08 won't be 2009.08 as soon as you run pacman -Syu
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 10:04 +0200, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> maybe we should delete it.
> Did you mean 'identifying whether a system is arch linux' (which seems
> pretty pointless, you know when a system is arch linux) OR do you mean
> 'identify which "version" an arch system is' ?
> Assuming th
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:12:53 +1000
richard terry wrote:
> Thanks for the replies, me I didn't mean anything, they just asked me
> what was in the file.
>
> pacman -Q obviously not the answer, but whilst on that - is it
> possible to do a pacman -Q, save the output somewhere, then on
> another
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:12:53 +1000
richard terry wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 August 2009 18:04:42 Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 09:56:13 +0200
> >
> > Jan de Groot wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 17:45 +1000, richard terry wrote:
> > > > /etc/arch-release
> > > >
> > > > Anyone
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 18:04:42 Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 09:56:13 +0200
>
> Jan de Groot wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 17:45 +1000, richard terry wrote:
> > > /etc/arch-release
> > >
> > > Anyone know what is meant to be in this file
> > >
> > > The guys on the gambas
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 09:56:13 +0200
Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 17:45 +1000, richard terry wrote:
> > /etc/arch-release
> >
> > Anyone know what is meant to be in this file
> >
> > The guys on the gambas user list are writing some sort of script so
> > users can identify details
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 17:45 +1000, richard terry wrote:
> /etc/arch-release
>
> Anyone know what is meant to be in this file
>
> The guys on the gambas user list are writing some sort of script so users can
> identify details of their system in case of bugs etc, and i was asked if
> this file
/etc/arch-release
Anyone know what is meant to be in this file
The guys on the gambas user list are writing some sort of script so users can
identify details of their system in case of bugs etc, and i was asked if
this file exists, which is does, but it is empty?
?any other unique arch ident
Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Am Donnerstag 11 Dezember 2008 schrieb Grigorios Bouzakis:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Christopher Daley
wrote:
I know there are new archboot isos up for testing on the mirrors. Maybe
you could work on getting AIF integrated with that?
ftp://locke.s
Am Donnerstag 11 Dezember 2008 schrieb Grigorios Bouzakis:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Christopher Daley
wrote:
> > I know there are new archboot isos up for testing on the mirrors. Maybe
> > you could work on getting AIF integrated with that?
> >
> > ftp://locke.suu.edu/linux/dist/archl
Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 2:27 AM, Fredrik Eriksson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dieter Plaetinck schrieb:
Hi all,
Any estimation when the next arch release will be? Or will it be
announced on this mailing list a few days before? that would be good
enough too.
The r
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 2:27 AM, Fredrik Eriksson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Dieter Plaetinck schrieb:
>>> Hi all,
>>> Any estimation when the next arch release will be? Or will it be
>>> announced on this mailing list a few days before? that would be good
>>> enough too.
>>>
>>> The reason I'm
> Dieter Plaetinck schrieb:
>> Hi all,
>> Any estimation when the next arch release will be? Or will it be
>> announced on this mailing list a few days before? that would be good
>> enough too.
>>
>> The reason I'm asking is AIF has again undergone many changes. I could
>> start working now on a
Dieter Plaetinck schrieb:
Hi all,
Any estimation when the next arch release will be? Or will it be
announced on this mailing list a few days before? that would be good
enough too.
The reason I'm asking is AIF has again undergone many changes. I could
start working now on a usable, reasonab
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Christopher Daley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know there are new archboot isos up for testing on the mirrors. Maybe you
> could work on getting AIF integrated with that?
>
> ftp://locke.suu.edu/linux/dist/archlinux/iso/archboot/2008.12/
>
I would say no since
I know there are new archboot isos up for testing on the mirrors. Maybe you
could work on getting AIF integrated with that?
ftp://locke.suu.edu/linux/dist/archlinux/iso/archboot/2008.12/
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Daenyth Blank
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> I think that
I think that the hope is to have a new installer iso out before
christmas. Not sure yet.
Hi all,
Any estimation when the next arch release will be? Or will it be
announced on this mailing list a few days before? that would be good
enough too.
The reason I'm asking is AIF has again undergone many changes. I could
start working now on a usable, reasonably stable alpha release wit
31 matches
Mail list logo
