Re: [arch-general] arch-general Digest, Vol 142, Issue 24

2016-08-19 Thread Doug Newgard
On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 10:17:34 -0500 "ITwrx.org" wrote: > Nothing personal to the OP(maybe this wasn't intentional flamebait), but > I, myself, don't want to hear "news"/propaganda about MS open source > trapware in an Arch Linux mailing list or anywhere else for that matter. And I don't want to h

Re: [arch-general] arch-general Digest, Vol 142, Issue 24

2016-08-19 Thread A Blesius
Am 19.08.2016 um 17:17 schrieb ITwrx.org: > I, myself, don't want to hear "news"/propaganda about MS open source > trapware in an Arch Linux mailing list or anywhere else for that matter. Some might be interested in it. That's what a ML is for. > I see it's been uploaded it to aur. great. I won't

Re: [arch-general] arch-general Digest, Vol 142, Issue 24

2016-08-19 Thread Hunter Connelly via arch-general
I was just wondering about what people thought about having MS code in the repos. I remember Skype used to be in multilib, and that wasn't even open source. I didn't expect this much of a reaction. Sorry if this isn't the place to discuss things like that. On August 19, 2016 11:17:34 AM EDT, "

Re: [arch-general] arch-general Digest, Vol 142, Issue 24

2016-08-19 Thread ITwrx.org
On 08/18/2016 08:49 PM, arch-general-requ...@archlinux.org wrote: > Send arch-general mailing list submissions to > arch-general@archlinux.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.archlinux.org/listinfo/arch-general > or, via email, send a messag