Re: [arch-general] about FS#30053 and systemd service/unit file in general

2012-06-11 Thread Rodrigo Rivas
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:24 PM, solsTiCe d'Hiver < solstice.dhi...@gmail.com> wrote: > @rodrigo: +1 for .include but it does not work if one have to change an > already defined directive. > Yes, that is unfortunate. But systemd is still a WIP, so maybe they will eventually make up something for

Re: [arch-general] about FS#30053 and systemd service/unit file in general

2012-06-11 Thread solsTiCe d'Hiver
@tom @rodrigo. Ok. Thank you to make it more clear for me. And I thought the gpm arg declared in /etc/conf.d/gpm was needed. It is not here. But others might need it. Hence the bug (feature request) not opened by me. Yes. The only needed part was the [Install] one So, configuration will be handl

Re: [arch-general] about FS#30053 and systemd service/unit file in general

2012-06-11 Thread Rodrigo Rivas
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:59 AM, solsTiCe d'Hiver < solstice.dhi...@gmail.com> wrote: > For me, systemd service/unit file are just meant to be that, tailored to > archlinux. > > I think that they talk about the lines EnvironmentFile=/etc/conf.d/gpm ExecStart=/usr/sbin/gpm $GPM_ARGS The

Re: [arch-general] about FS#30053 and systemd service/unit file in general

2012-06-11 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:59 AM, solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote: > Systemd is made to boot/init a linux distro. But our distro here is archlinux > and we are making archlinux package, right ? > I understand we ship unpatched upstream package, but do we want to ship > broken package so that they stay unto

[arch-general] about FS#30053 and systemd service/unit file in general

2012-06-11 Thread solsTiCe d'Hiver
hi. So I was playing with an archlinux guest in vbox to learn a bit about systemd. And I found out that the gpm.service was broken. systemctl enable or systemctl start does not work for gpm.service. I looked for bugs and found FS#30053 https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/30053 I just copied and paste