Re: [arch-general] Yes you have standing to sue GRSecurity - Two options that can be used in concert or separately

2017-08-01 Thread Henrik Danielsson via arch-general
Den 1 aug. 2017 06:29 skrev "Grady Martin via arch-general" < arch-general@archlinux.org>: On 2017年07月31日 17時07分, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > I'm not sure what you want to achieve by posting this to arch-general, > this issue really does not concern Arch Linux and I would argue it is out > off sco

Re: [arch-general] Yes you have standing to sue GRSecurity - Two options that can be used in concert or separately

2017-07-31 Thread Grady Martin via arch-general
On 2017年07月31日 17時07分, Jelle van der Waa wrote: I'm not sure what you want to achieve by posting this to arch-general, this issue really does not concern Arch Linux and I would argue it is out off scope for this mailing list. I differ in opinion. The scope of any communications medium is a pro

Re: [arch-general] Yes you have standing to sue GRSecurity - Two options that can be used in concert or separately

2017-07-31 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On 07/31/17 at 02:46pm, ni...@redchan.it wrote: > Thank you Mr. Rankin for saying this. Bruce Perens blocked me* (also calling > me a "fool" later to a 3rd party) after I started to brainstorm the defenses > that would be raised about a week or two ago: letting everyone in the world > know what he

Re: [arch-general] Yes you have standing to sue GRSecurity - Two options that can be used in concert or separately

2017-07-31 Thread nisus
Thank you Mr. Rankin for saying this. Bruce Perens blocked me* (also calling me a "fool" later to a 3rd party) after I started to brainstorm the defenses that would be raised about a week or two ago: letting everyone in the world know what he thought of me for mentioning laches etc. Such talk

Re: [arch-general] Yes you have standing to sue GRSecurity.

2017-07-30 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Sun, 30 Jul 2017 10:35:18 +, ni...@redchan.it wrote: >Thank you. When earlier I brought up latches when I started >brainstorming the defenses GRSecurity might raise, Bruce Perens >quickly dismissed me as a "fool". > >https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2017/07/msg00830.html Are you seriou

Re: [arch-general] Yes you have standing to sue GRSecurity.

2017-07-30 Thread nisus
Thank you. When earlier I brought up latches when I started brainstorming the defenses GRSecurity might raise, Bruce Perens quickly dismissed me as a "fool". https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2017/07/msg00830.html OK, I apologize to all who were involved in this conversation. I will block

Re: [arch-general] Yes you have standing to sue GRSecurity.

2017-07-29 Thread David C. Rankin
On 07/29/2017 07:53 AM, ni...@redchan.it wrote: > ( NOTE: If you would like to read on how your copyright is being violated by > GRSecurity, Bruce Perens posted a good write-up on his web-page ) > ( > perens.com/blog/2017/06/28/warning-grsecurity-potential-contributory-infringement-risk-for-custome

[arch-general] Yes you have standing to sue GRSecurity.

2017-07-29 Thread nisus
It has come to my attention that some entities are claiming that you, dear Linux Hackers, (1)need to go through some foundation or get some permission from upon high in-order to sue the progenitors of GRSecurity for their violation of section 6 of the terms underwhich the linux kernel is distri