2010/2/6, Andrea Scarpino :
> Seems that no one is interested, move it to AUR or simply delete it.
I will be moving it to the AUR.
--
Arch Linux Developer
http://www.archlinux.org
http://www.archlinux.it
On Thursday 04 February 2010 22:01:50 Giovanni Scafora wrote:
> BTW, yafray isn't under development anymore, so or we move it to the
> AUR or we leave it there...
Seems that no one is interested, move it to AUR or simply delete it.
--
Andrea `bash` Scarpino
Arch Linux Developer
On 4 February 2010 22:56, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
> On Thursday 04 February 2010 22:52:34 Matěj Týč wrote:
>> That one is not true, Yafaray (note the added 'a', AFAIK Yafray does not
>> exist any more) is actively developed and last website news are two
>> weeks old.
> But giovanni said that yafray
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:27 AM, Ray Rashif wrote:
> On 05/02/2010, Giovanni Scafora wrote:
>> 2010/2/4, Matěj Týč :
>>> That one is not true, Yafaray (note the added 'a', AFAIK Yafray does not
>>> exist any more) is actively developed and last website news are two
>>> weeks old.
>>
>> I know, y
On 05/02/2010, Giovanni Scafora wrote:
> 2010/2/4, Matěj Týč :
>> That one is not true, Yafaray (note the added 'a', AFAIK Yafray does not
>> exist any more) is actively developed and last website news are two
>> weeks old.
>
> I know, yafaray is actively developed, but we have yafray in extra
>
2010/2/4, Matěj Týč :
> That one is not true, Yafaray (note the added 'a', AFAIK Yafray does not
> exist any more) is actively developed and last website news are two
> weeks old.
I know, yafaray is actively developed, but we have yafray in extra
repo, so I ask here to replace it with yafaray 0.
2010/2/4, Matěj Týč :
> That one is not true, Yafaray (note the added 'a', AFAIK Yafray does not
> exist any more) is actively developed and last website news are two
> weeks old.
> http://www.yafaray.org/
Please, read at http://www.yafaray.org/download
"YafRay 0.0.9 sources.
The last YafRay
On Thursday 04 February 2010 22:52:34 Matěj Týč wrote:
> That one is not true, Yafaray (note the added 'a', AFAIK Yafray does not
> exist any more) is actively developed and last website news are two
> weeks old.
But giovanni said that yafray is not under developed and it is replaced by
yafaray. H
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 22:01 +0100, Giovanni Scafora wrote:
> 2010/2/4, Andrea Scarpino :
> > if you will maintain it, do this.
>
> I will not maintain it.
> BTW, yafray isn't under development anymore, so or we move it to the
> AUR or we leave it there...
That one is not true, Yafaray (note the a
On Thursday 04 February 2010 22:01:50 Giovanni Scafora wrote:
> I will not maintain it.
> BTW, yafray isn't under development anymore, so or we move it to the
> AUR or we leave it there...
So, is there some DEV or TUs intersted to maintain yafaray? Or can we move it
to AUR?
--
Andrea `bash` Sca
2010/2/4, Andrea Scarpino :
> if you will maintain it, do this.
I will not maintain it.
BTW, yafray isn't under development anymore, so or we move it to the
AUR or we leave it there...
If we want to leave it there, I guess that we will have to upgrade it
to yafaray 0.1.1 (yafaray not yafray, it ha
On Thursday 04 February 2010 21:17:11 Giovanni Scafora wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> the last yafray release was the 0.0.9 version in Summer 2006.
> Notice that these sources aren't under development anymore.
> I would like replace it with yafaray 0.1.1.
> What do you think about?
if you will maintain it,
Hi all,
the last yafray release was the 0.0.9 version in Summer 2006.
Notice that these sources aren't under development anymore.
I would like replace it with yafaray 0.1.1.
What do you think about?
--
Arch Linux Developer
http://www.archlinux.org
http://www.archlinux.it
13 matches
Mail list logo
