Re: [arch-general] What changed dual-boot grub definition (hd0, 0) -> (hd0, 1)

2013-03-18 Thread Jan Steffens
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 3:55 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > All, > > Just a note. After working through the update that brought in systemd, a > final > issue is that somehow the drive designation for grub (legacy) for the windows > partition was changed from (hd0,0) to (hd0,1). This box is a simp

Re: [arch-general] What changed dual-boot grub definition (hd0, 0) -> (hd0, 1)

2013-03-18 Thread Mauro Santos
On 18-03-2013 14:55, David C. Rankin wrote: > While the fix is simple, what caused the loss of sda1 in the first place? > This box has booted Arch and then XP as (hd0,0) since 2009. Now it requires > (hd0,1). Is this related to the same udev issue that caused eth0 -> enp2s0? If > so, can I rely

[arch-general] What changed dual-boot grub definition (hd0, 0) -> (hd0, 1)

2013-03-18 Thread David C. Rankin
All, Just a note. After working through the update that brought in systemd, a final issue is that somehow the drive designation for grub (legacy) for the windows partition was changed from (hd0,0) to (hd0,1). This box is a simple old dell box with a single 500G drive. Windows has 80G and the res