2012/8/3 Jelle van der Waa :
> On 03/08/12 00:55, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
>>> wrote:
Are there any plans for eventually adopting Wayland over X?
>>>
>>> I'm not aware of any
On 03/08/12 00:55, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
>> wrote:
>>> Are there any plans for eventually adopting Wayland over X?
>>
>> I'm not aware of any discussions.
>>
>> If I understand c
Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
> Are there any plans for eventually adopting Wayland over X?
We're Archlinux, we start in command line and have to pacman -S
xorg-server to even get the basic Xorg server. Wayland will be the same, more
than likely we
will have either multiple versions of stuff or incl
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
> wrote:
>> Are there any plans for eventually adopting Wayland over X?
>
> I'm not aware of any discussions.
>
> If I understand correctly, we won't have to make a decision either
> way,
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
wrote:
> Are there any plans for eventually adopting Wayland over X?
I'm not aware of any discussions.
If I understand correctly, we won't have to make a decision either
way, we can just add support for Wayland to the various parts of the
sta
Are there any plans for eventually adopting Wayland over X?
Other bleeding edge distros mentioned they will be adopting it [1], [2]
I am not saying Archlinux should follow, just asking if there is (was)
any discussion about it.
[1]: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-November/14
6 matches
Mail list logo
