Thank You :)
I wanted to do sth. similar as the Gnome tool in Java, so I tried the
RSS variant, but it doesn't seem to be reliable.
I'm using XFCE, so I wanted to have some tool in a language I'm using
for software development, but it seems not possible, yet.
So, of course, I'll have to do
Thank You, subscribed it now :)
Regards,
Peter
Am 01.11.2016 um 13:34 schrieb Chris Warrick via arch-general:
On 1 November 2016 at 13:28, Peter Nabbefeld wrote:
Thank You. At some time I've subscribed to the arch linux update feed, but
it doesn't seem very useful, so I'll remove it:
1. It
> Morning. Try this, sudo pacman -Syu --force.
Please do not run that command unless the Arch site specifically recommends
it. Forcing a full system upgrade is extremely dangerous.
The safe solution is to force only ttf-dejavu.
I subscribed to the Arch Announcement feed at https://lists.archlinux.o
rg/listinfo/arch-announce
You almost never get any mail (which I love). It's actually a copy of
everything which will be shown on the arch website frontpage. Since I
never had any trouble with updates besides those mentioned o
On 1 November 2016 at 13:28, Peter Nabbefeld wrote:
> Thank You. At some time I've subscribed to the arch linux update feed, but
> it doesn't seem very useful, so I'll remove it:
>
> 1. It seems not all updates are reported
> 2. It doesn't show any hints - just like this
>
> Do You probably know o
Thank You!
Regards,
Peter
Am 01.11.2016 um 12:23 schrieb matthew dyer via arch-general:
Morning. Try this, sudo pacman -Syu --force. Worked for me thismorning
after this was sugested to me by someone on the sonar support list and
worked with my machine. HTH.
Matthew
On 11/01/2016 04:4
Thank You. At some time I've subscribed to the arch linux update feed,
but it doesn't seem very useful, so I'll remove it:
1. It seems not all updates are reported
2. It doesn't show any hints - just like this
Do You probably know of any other more useful feed(s)?
Kind regards
Peter
Am 01.11
Morning. Try this, sudo pacman -Syu --force. Worked for me thismorning
after this was sugested to me by someone on the sonar support list and
worked with my machine. HTH.
Matthew
On 11/01/2016 04:47 AM, Peter Nabbefeld wrote:
Hello,
cannot update packages, as ttf-dejavu has conflicts
See the website for tips on how to update: https://www.archlinux.org/ne
ws/ttf-dejavu-237-will-require-forced-upgrade/
pacman -S --force ttf-deja
ente
On Tue, 2016-11-01 at 09:47 +0100, Peter Nabbefeld wrote:
> Hello,
>
> cannot update packages, as ttf-dejavu has conflicts.
>
>
> ---
Hello,
cannot update packages, as ttf-dejavu has conflicts.
---
Output
---
Fehler: Konnte den Vorgang nicht durchführen (In Konflikt stehende Dateien)
ttf-dejavu: /etc/fonts/conf.d/20-unhint-small-dejavu-sans-mono.conf
existiert im Dateisystem
ttf-dejavu: /etc/fonts/conf.d/20-
Hi,
Am 20.08.2014 um 22:37 schrieb Anatol Pomozov:
> Just pushed updated avr-gcc avr-libc avr-gdb to [community-testing].
> Should be available at your mirror soon.
Thanks, just installed it.
> Please install the packages
> from that repository and file a bug if you see any regressions.
Haven't
Hi
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Karol Babioch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the current maintainer of avr-gcc and avr-libc, Jakob Gruber, seems to
> be away until October [1]. In the meantime new versions of both packages
> have been released. Due to a bug within avr-gcc 4.9.0, avr-libc 1.8.1
> cannot be
Hi,
the current maintainer of avr-gcc and avr-libc, Jakob Gruber, seems to
be away until October [1]. In the meantime new versions of both packages
have been released. Due to a bug within avr-gcc 4.9.0, avr-libc 1.8.1
cannot be built [2] and avr-gcc 4.9.1 is required, so actually both
packages sho
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:34, Matthew Gyurgyik wrote:
> On 01.31.2012 04:38, Myra Nelson wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 03:13, Ionut Biru wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for the info. There are many things I still don't know. I
>> figured by
>> rebuilding them it would tell me if something wa
On 01.31.2012 04:38, Myra Nelson wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 03:13, Ionut Biru
wrote:
Thanks for the info. There are many things I still don't know. I
figured by
rebuilding them it would tell me if something was wrong on my
machine.
Another reason for me not to file a bug report. The p
On 01/31/2012 11:38 AM, Myra Nelson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 03:13, Ionut Biru wrote:
>
>> On 01/31/2012 10:10 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
>>> Just reinstalling them would be enough...This is an issue with
>>> running the install scripts and the order in which the packages are
>>> installe
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 03:13, Ionut Biru wrote:
> On 01/31/2012 10:10 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> > Just reinstalling them would be enough...This is an issue with
> > running the install scripts and the order in which the packages are
> > installed. I believe that this is being looked into.
>
On 01/31/2012 10:10 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 31/01/12 17:48, Myra Nelson wrote:
>> I suppose this should go to the bug tracker, however I'll do it here first.
>> It seems a bit much to file a pair of bugs for.
>>
>> During my updates this evening the libpng/libtiff rebuild bit.
>>
>> ( 7/85) upg
On 31/01/12 17:48, Myra Nelson wrote:
> I suppose this should go to the bug tracker, however I'll do it here first.
> It seems a bit much to file a pair of bugs for.
>
> During my updates this evening the libpng/libtiff rebuild bit.
>
> ( 7/85) upgrading gdk-pixbuf2
>
>
> [
I suppose this should go to the bug tracker, however I'll do it here first.
It seems a bit much to file a pair of bugs for.
During my updates this evening the libpng/libtiff rebuild bit.
( 7/85) upgrading gdk-pixbuf2
[
20 matches
Mail list logo
