2009/4/7 Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi :
> Using bundled libs are not a good idea. Use bundled in case that are
> _really_ necessary.
Ok, so I added libsexy as dependence in gmpc 0.18.0-2
--
Andrea `BaSh` Scarpino
Arch Linux Developer
slubman wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 April 2009 19:13:46 Andrea Scarpino wrote:
>
>> 2009/4/7 slubman :
>>
>>> Because of:
>>>
>>> ldd $(which gmpc) | grep sexy
>>>libsexy.so.2 => /usr/lib/libsexy.so.2 (0x7fc9f1977000)
>>>
>> Do you know what are the vantages of use libsexy?
>>
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 19:13:46 Andrea Scarpino wrote:
> 2009/4/7 slubman :
> > Because of:
> >
> > ldd $(which gmpc) | grep sexy
> >libsexy.so.2 => /usr/lib/libsexy.so.2 (0x7fc9f1977000)
>
> Do you know what are the vantages of use libsexy?
> because I built it without and it isn't r
2009/4/7 Allan McRae :
> For any dev looking to build this for the repos, it requires a libmpd update
> which has a soname bump also requiring xfce4-mpc-plugin to be rebuilt.
Thanks Allan, done
--
Andrea `BaSh` Scarpino
Arch Linux Developer
2009/4/7 slubman :
> Because of:
>
> ldd $(which gmpc) | grep sexy
> libsexy.so.2 => /usr/lib/libsexy.so.2 (0x7fc9f1977000)
>
Do you know what are the vantages of use libsexy?
because I built it without and it isn't required:
$ ldd $(which gmpc) | grep sexy
$
--
Andrea `BaSh` Scarpino
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 19:06:12 Andrea Scarpino wrote:
> 2009/4/7 slubman :
> > Reply to self, still some issues in the previous one
>
> I changed
> make DESTDIR=$startdir/pkg install
> to
> make DESTDIR=${pkgdir} install
> and pushed libmpd 0.18.0
>
> why you put libsexy as dependence of gmp
2009/4/7 slubman :
> Reply to self, still some issues in the previous one
I changed
make DESTDIR=$startdir/pkg install
to
make DESTDIR=${pkgdir} install
and pushed libmpd 0.18.0
why you put libsexy as dependence of gmpc? I don't see it in this list[1]
[1] http://gmpc.wikia.com/wiki/Installat
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 18:57:03 slubman wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 April 2009 18:48:55 Andrea Scarpino wrote:
> > from your pkguild:
> >
> > mv index.php* ./${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tar.gz
> > tar xzf ${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tar.gz
> >
> > why this?!
>
> Forgot to remove this line from previous versions
2009/4/7 slubman :
> Forgot to remove this line from previous versions (where there was no direct
> URL to source tarball)
>
> Correct one attached here.
also these are useless:
cd ${startdir}/src
tar xzf ${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tar.gz
--
Andrea `BaSh` Scarpino
Arch Linux Developer
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 18:48:55 Andrea Scarpino wrote:
> from your pkguild:
>
> mv index.php* ./${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tar.gz
> tar xzf ${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tar.gz
>
> why this?!
Forgot to remove this line from previous versions (where there was no direct
URL to source tarball)
Correct one a
from your pkguild:
mv index.php* ./${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tar.gz
tar xzf ${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tar.gz
why this?!
--
Andrea `BaSh` Scarpino
Arch Linux Developer
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 17:40:47 Allan McRae wrote:
> slubman wrote:
> > As stated in the thread on outdated PKGBUILD, this is an email with an
> > updated PKGBUILD for gmpc which is 2 releases behind the current one
> > available on the project site.
>
> For any dev looking to build this for the
slubman wrote:
As stated in the thread on outdated PKGBUILD, this is an email with an
updated PKGBUILD for gmpc which is 2 releases behind the current one
available on the project site.
For any dev looking to build this for the repos, it requires a libmpd
update which has a soname bump also
As stated in the thread on outdated PKGBUILD, this is an email with an
updated PKGBUILD for gmpc which is 2 releases behind the current one
available on the project site.
--
slubman
site: http://www.slubman.info/# $Id: PKGBUILD 356 2008-04-18 22:56:27Z aaron $
# Maintainer: tobias
# Contributor
14 matches
Mail list logo
