[2012-11-20 23:07:28 -0800] Jesus Alvarez:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 04:39:53PM +1100, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> > Having your personal repository in open access is great!
>
> Does that mean not PGP signed?
No, it means making the repository publicly accessible, as opposed to
keeping it on a private
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 04:39:53PM +1100, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> Having your personal repository in open access is great!
Does that mean not PGP signed?
> I would just additionally recommend putting a short banner at the root
> of your repository to act both as a short howto and legal statement;
[2012-11-20 20:48:42 -0800] Jesus Alvarez:
> The reason I ask this is because I created two signed repositories for some
> packages I maintain, zfs and netflix-desktop. They do have usage, and in my
> forum posts, people seem to really appreciate the availability of the repo.
> However, I am not a
On Tuesday 20 Nov 2012 22:32:13 Patrick Burroughs wrote:
> Who says he's not? All the packages he's mentioned are available on
> the AUR, maintained by him; he's offering unofficial repositories as a
> supplement to the AUR, for people like myself who don't want to kill
> their laptop compiling all
On Tuesday 20 Nov 2012 20:48:42 Jesus Alvarez wrote:
> When I brought the topic up in #archlinux, there was some concern I was
> using a repo and not solely relying on AUR.
Why do you not want to use AUR?
-- Cheers
Jayesh
5 matches
Mail list logo
