Re: [arch-general] udev rules from hplip are invalid after update

2011-11-21 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 8:33 PM, Hector Martinez-Seara wrote: > In my case I solve the problem by installing the package hplip-plugin > from AUR. Somehow when the rules where installed by the hp-setup > program something goes wrong. Yeah, the upstream rules are wrong, you need the Arch supplied o

Re: [arch-general] udev rules from hplip are invalid after update

2011-11-21 Thread Hector Martinez-Seara
Hi, In my case I solve the problem by installing the package hplip-plugin from AUR. Somehow when the rules where installed by the hp-setup program something goes wrong. Hector On 21 November 2011 21:12, Philipp Überbacher wrote: > Excerpts from Tom Gundersen's message of 2011-11-20 14:13:05 +0100

Re: [arch-general] udev rules from hplip are invalid after update

2011-11-21 Thread Philipp Überbacher
Excerpts from Tom Gundersen's message of 2011-11-20 14:13:05 +0100: > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Hector Martinez-Seara > wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > My system is fully updated so I guess that I have to assume  that I > > should file a bug against hplip. > > There are no /etc/udev/rules.d/* file

Re: [arch-general] udev rules from hplip are invalid after update

2011-11-20 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Hector Martinez-Seara wrote: > Hi Tom, > My system is fully updated so I guess that I have to assume  that I > should file a bug against hplip. There are no /etc/udev/rules.d/* files in the official hplip package, maybe they are some old stale files that you shoul

Re: [arch-general] udev rules from hplip are invalid after update

2011-11-20 Thread Hector Martinez-Seara
Hi Tom, My system is fully updated so I guess that I have to assume that I should file a bug against hplip. Hector On 20 November 2011 14:19, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Hector Martinez-Seara > wrote: >> After yesterday update I get the following message when reboot

Re: [arch-general] udev rules from hplip are invalid after update

2011-11-20 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Hector Martinez-Seara wrote: > After yesterday update I get the following message when rebooting the > computer (the computer boots fine): > > # > Sun Nov 20 12:45:34 2011: :: Triggering UDev uevents    [BUSY]  

[arch-general] udev rules from hplip are invalid after update

2011-11-20 Thread Hector Martinez-Seara
Hi, After yesterday update I get the following message when rebooting the computer (the computer boots fine): # Sun Nov 20 12:45:34 2011: :: Triggering UDev uevents[BUSY][DONE] Sun Nov 20 12:45:34 2011: :: Loading User-specified Modules

[arch-general] Udev rules

2009-12-17 Thread Majikinszzz
Hi I'm coming from an ubuntu background where this line in the udev.rule file worked. SUBSYSTEMS=="usb", ATTR{idVendor}=="0fd1", ATTR{idProduct}=="1000", ATTR{bConfigurationValue}=="1",RUN+="/bin/bash -c 'echo 3 > /sys/bus/usb/devices/%b/bConfigurationValue'" However this does not work in Arch

[arch-general] Udev rules

2009-12-17 Thread Majikinszzz
Hi I'm coming from an ubuntu background where this line in the udev.rule file worked. SUBSYSTEMS=="usb", ATTR{idVendor}=="0fd1", ATTR{idProduct}=="1000", ATTR{bConfigurationValue}=="1",RUN+="/bin/bash -c 'echo 3 > /sys/bus/usb/devices/%b/bConfigurationValue'" However this does not work in Arch

Re: [arch-general] udev rules policy

2009-04-23 Thread David C. Rankin
Aaron Griffin wrote: > Actually, that's not the same. I have a suspicion suse's udev is far > older, but the dir we're looking at should be /lib/udev/rules.d vs > /etc/udev/rules.d > Ahah!, Your right Aaron. I missed the /lib/udev/'rules.d'. I know it has been that way for a while, at least sinc

Re: [arch-general] udev rules policy

2009-04-23 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:22 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > Tobias Powalowski wrote: >> Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 schrieb Damjan Georgievski: >>> What is the policy for Udev rules in ArchLinux? >>> >>> There are 2 places where udev rules can be placed, /lib/udev/rules.d/ >>> and /etc/udev/rules.d/.

Re: [arch-general] udev rules policy

2009-04-23 Thread David C. Rankin
Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 schrieb Damjan Georgievski: >> What is the policy for Udev rules in ArchLinux? >> >> There are 2 places where udev rules can be placed, /lib/udev/rules.d/ >> and /etc/udev/rules.d/. >> Now, I think the /lib/ directory should be only for the rules

Re: [arch-general] udev rules policy

2009-04-22 Thread Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > >> Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 schrieb Damjan Georgievski: >> >>> What is the policy for Udev rules in ArchLinux? >>> >>> There are 2 places where udev rules can be placed, /lib/udev/rules.d/ >>> and /etc/udev

Re: [arch-general] udev rules policy

2009-04-22 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 schrieb Damjan Georgievski: >> What is the policy for Udev rules in ArchLinux? >> >> There are 2 places where udev rules can be placed, /lib/udev/rules.d/ >> and /etc/udev/rules.d/. >> Now, I think the /lib/ dire

Re: [arch-general] udev rules policy

2009-04-22 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 schrieb Damjan Georgievski: > What is the policy for Udev rules in ArchLinux? > > There are 2 places where udev rules can be placed, /lib/udev/rules.d/ > and /etc/udev/rules.d/. > Now, I think the /lib/ directory should be only for the rules coming > from upstream udev, an

[arch-general] udev rules policy

2009-04-22 Thread Damjan Georgievski
What is the policy for Udev rules in ArchLinux? There are 2 places where udev rules can be placed, /lib/udev/rules.d/ and /etc/udev/rules.d/. Now, I think the /lib/ directory should be only for the rules coming from upstream udev, and the /etc/ directory is for rules coming from ArchLinux packages