Hi
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 1:22 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 10.06.2013 05:18, schrieb Anatol Pomozov:
> > "sync" is not a workaround, it is a right solution.
>
> You are wrong.
>
> > Under the hood copying in linux works following way. Every time you read
> > something from disk the file infor
Hello,
> It would be good to know which usb drive we are talking about, if it has
> any "features" such as U3 or if it was an offer and came with publicity
> materials or something like that.
It an old arse pen drive, but I tried with several devices, the problem is
common to them.
> On another
On 09-06-2013 22:23, Alfredo Palhares wrote:
> Hello,
>
> So I was creating a archlinux usb bootable drive:
>
> [root@masterkorp-laptop Downloads]# dd bs=4M if=archlinux-2013.06.01-dual.iso
> of=/dev/sdb
> 130+1 records in
> 130+1 records out
> 548405248 bytes (548 MB) copied, 0.964976 s, 568 MB
Excerpts from Pedro Emílio Machado de Brito's message of Mon Jun 10 02:53:22
+0200 2013:
> I've been having this sort of problems with removable storage lately
> (copying multiple GBs of songs in a few seconds, except not really).
> The workaround I found out is to run the sync command after copyi
Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 10.06.2013 05:18, schrieb Anatol Pomozov:
> > "sync" is not a workaround, it is a right solution.
>
> You are wrong.
>
> > Under the hood copying in linux works following way. Every time you read
> > something from disk the file information will stay cached in memory re
Hi,
> I always unmount my devices before unplugging, but I found out that
> after writing a lot of data to a slow device (SD card in my case),
> umount or udiskie-umount would block for a long time, then exit with
> some weird error message and the data would have not been correctly
> written.
>
Am 10.06.2013 05:18, schrieb Anatol Pomozov:
> "sync" is not a workaround, it is a right solution.
You are wrong.
> Under the hood copying in linux works following way. Every time you read
> something from disk the file information will stay cached in memory region
> called "buffer cache".
That
Hi
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Pedro Emílio Machado de Brito <
pedroembr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2013/6/10 Anatol Pomozov :
> >
> > "sync" is not a workaround, it is a right solution.
> >
> > Under the hood copying in linux works following way. Every time you read
> > something from disk the
2013/6/10 Anatol Pomozov :
>
> "sync" is not a workaround, it is a right solution.
>
> Under the hood copying in linux works following way. Every time you read
> something from disk the file information will stay cached in memory region
> called "buffer cache". Next time you read the same informati
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 5:18 AM, Anatol Pomozov
wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Pedro Emílio Machado de Brito <
> pedroembr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 2013/6/9 Alfredo Palhares :
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > So I was creating a archlinux usb bootable drive:
>> >
>> > [root@masterkorp-lap
Hi
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Pedro Emílio Machado de Brito <
pedroembr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2013/6/9 Alfredo Palhares :
> > Hello,
> >
> > So I was creating a archlinux usb bootable drive:
> >
> > [root@masterkorp-laptop Downloads]# dd bs=4M
> if=archlinux-2013.06.01-dual.iso of=/dev/sdb
2013/6/9 Alfredo Palhares :
> Hello,
>
> So I was creating a archlinux usb bootable drive:
>
> [root@masterkorp-laptop Downloads]# dd bs=4M if=archlinux-2013.06.01-dual.iso
> of=/dev/sdb
> 130+1 records in
> 130+1 records out
> 548405248 bytes (548 MB) copied, 0.964976 s, 568 MB/s
>
> I was like W
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Alfredo Palhares
wrote:
Hello,
So I was creating a archlinux usb bootable drive:
[root@masterkorp-laptop Downloads]# dd bs=4M
if=archlinux-2013.06.01-dual.iso of=/dev/sdb
130+1 records in
130+1 records out
548405248 bytes (548 MB) copied, 0.964976 s, 568 MB/s
I wa
Hello,
So I was creating a archlinux usb bootable drive:
[root@masterkorp-laptop Downloads]# dd bs=4M if=archlinux-2013.06.01-dual.iso
of=/dev/sdb
130+1 records in
130+1 records out
548405248 bytes (548 MB) copied, 0.964976 s, 568 MB/s
I was like WOW, this was too fast! But nothing ever gets wr
14 matches
Mail list logo
