Re: [arch-general] Softlink /media

2012-08-06 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> Well... First, automounting is a serious security hole. Serious? In what way? There are far more serious security holes enabled by default that if your concerned have to be disabled or be prevented by disabling the usb port in the bios. Also if a user has physical access on 99.9% of desktops he

Re: [arch-general] Softlink /media

2012-08-05 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Sun, 2012-08-05 at 11:12 -0500, Leonid Isaev wrote: > Your email client is Evolution 3.4.2 which probably means you use > gnome3 No it does mean that I used GNOME2 and I will continue sharing Evolution's maildir with other Linux installs on my computer, while keeping flags etc. too. I'm running

Re: [arch-general] Softlink /media

2012-08-05 Thread Mantas Mikulėnas
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Is /media still needed by anything? Yes, I think udisks (v1) still mounts stuff there. > There's no big difference between typing > > # ls /run/media/spinymouse/INTENSO > > and > > # ls /media/spinymouse/INTENSO Then `rm /media` and create t

Re: [arch-general] Softlink /media

2012-08-05 Thread Leonid Isaev
On Sun, 05 Aug 2012 17:56:22 +0200 Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Am I the only one mounting e.g. an USB stick by the desktop and then > using a terminal emulation? No... I have never even started my thunar :) > > Is /media still needed by anything? If not I would prefer a softlink > media -> /run/medi

[arch-general] Softlink /media

2012-08-05 Thread Ralf Mardorf
Am I the only one mounting e.g. an USB stick by the desktop and then using a terminal emulation? Is /media still needed by anything? If not I would prefer a softlink media -> /run/media. Hm? There's no big difference between typing # ls /run/media/spinymouse/INTENSO and # ls /media/spinymouse