On Mon, 02 Nov 2009, Magnus Therning wrote:
> Well, all I'm really interested in is finding out whether it's
> xorg-server or xf86-video-nv which is broken. Then raise a bug, and
> get it fixed :-)
I just add here that I had a similar issue, which I *thought* I was able
to track down to a broken
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 03:45:13PM +0100, Xavier wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 3:01 PM, David C. Rankin
> wrote:
> >
> > Just be thankful you are not using ATI hardware where everything prior to
> > the
> > 2400 Series cards were deprecated to "Legacy" cards and all Linux support
> > dropped i
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 3:01 PM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
>
> Just be thankful you are not using ATI hardware where everything prior to the
> 2400 Series cards were deprecated to "Legacy" cards and all Linux support
> dropped in March ;-)
>
> (performance difference between fglrx and ati 1066 FPS ve
>
>
> this really sucks. i have a perfectly fine fx5800 card. it performs
> (performed) very well, sucks to have it labeled as "deprecated" and not
> being able to actually use it decently on a modern system.
>
> Dieter
>
Just be thankful you are not using ATI hardware where everything prior
Xavier wrote:
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Lars Tennstedt wrote:
Hello,
it seems that the NVIDIA developers will only fix it if they have time to do
it. I guess that the legacy driver does not have a high priority.
I tried the nouveau driver and it works on my old GeForce 3 even with
com
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Lars Tennstedt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> it seems that the NVIDIA developers will only fix it if they have time to do
> it. I guess that the legacy driver does not have a high priority.
>
> I tried the nouveau driver and it works on my old GeForce 3 even with
> compositin
Hello,
it seems that the NVIDIA developers will only fix it if they have time
to do it. I guess that the legacy driver does not have a high priority.
I tried the nouveau driver and it works on my old GeForce 3 even with
compositing. It is a little bit slow but it does the job. Thanks for the
Thomas Bächler schreef:
[ Xorg segfaults with Nvidia driver ]
I don't know what you think, but I don't get the part where the nvidia
dev says they plan to fix it, but he can't promise if and when. So
they plan to fix it, but don't really know if they plan to fix it.
So basically, you're scre
Hi,
Xorg with nvidia-96xx for a GeForce 3 Ti 200 does not start anymore on
my Arch Linux installation (i686). First I thought that it was a failure
caused by SLiM because the error output on screen was "respawning too
fast" and I switched from respawn to once but that did not help. Even
stand
Lars Tennstedt schrieb:
Hi,
Xorg with nvidia-96xx for a GeForce 3 Ti 200 does not start anymore on
my Arch Linux installation (i686). First I thought that it was a failure
caused by SLiM because the error output on screen was "respawning too
fast" and I switched from respawn to once but that
Magnus Therning schrob:
> Anyone else seeing something the same behaviour?
Not the exact same thing here but since the latest upgrade to X.org 1.7.1 and
Nvidia 190.42 two days ago my X already crashed twice with no errors in
/var/log/Xorg.0.log except the following backtrace (with segfault):
Ba
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
>
> i installed xf86-video-nouveau on my box at home.
> for simple things it works fine.
> but for intensive applications (that do a lot of redrawing, i guess)
> such as rosegarden, it makes my PC really slow.
> also 2D games such as world of
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 14:18:53 +0100
Xavier wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Tobias Powalowski
> wrote:
> > Before using vesa driver you should at least give nouveau and nv
> > driver a shot.
> > Both lack on 3D support but for 2D operations they should work fine.
> > Nouveau has nice kms s
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Magnus Therning wrote:
>
> Well, all I'm really interested in is finding out whether it's
> xorg-server or xf86-video-nv which is broken. Then raise a bug, and
> get it fixed :-)
>
Another big difference between nv and nouveau is that nouveau is
actively developed
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Am Montag 02 November 2009 schrieb Magnus Therning:
>> On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
>> > Am Montag 02 November 2009 schrieb Magnus Therning:
>> >> I just upgraded this morning and after a reboot X refuses to
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Before using vesa driver you should at least give nouveau and nv driver a
> shot.
> Both lack on 3D support but for 2D operations they should work fine.
> Nouveau has nice kms support, which is nice if it works on your card.
> http://wiki.
Am Montag 02 November 2009 schrieb Magnus Therning:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> > Am Montag 02 November 2009 schrieb Magnus Therning:
> >> I just upgraded this morning and after a reboot X refuses to start.
> >> My /var/log/Xorg.0.log contains a message about a se
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Am Montag 02 November 2009 schrieb Magnus Therning:
>> I just upgraded this morning and after a reboot X refuses to start.
>> My /var/log/Xorg.0.log contains a message about a segmentation fault
>> and a short backtrace.
>>
>> I'm on AMD6
Am Montag 02 November 2009 schrieb Magnus Therning:
> I just upgraded this morning and after a reboot X refuses to start.
> My /var/log/Xorg.0.log contains a message about a segmentation fault
> and a short backtrace.
>
> I'm on AMD64, with an nVidia card (I'm using the Xorg driver, nv).
>
> Anyo
I just upgraded this morning and after a reboot X refuses to start.
My /var/log/Xorg.0.log contains a message about a segmentation fault
and a short backtrace.
I'm on AMD64, with an nVidia card (I'm using the Xorg driver, nv).
Anyone else seeing something the same behaviour?
Any suggestions on ho
20 matches
Mail list logo
