> There is no need. Pm-utils is a frame-work which supports uswsusp
> (s2ram/s2disk), tuxonice and kernel (which is default). So user can just
> setup /etc/pm/config.d/config like so:
>
> SLEEP_MODULE="uswsusp"
> SUSPEND_MODULES="pata_hpt37x"
>
> Although uswsusp supports quirks and maintains a w
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Karol Babioch wrote:
There must be something similar for s2ram. According to the wiki
(http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Suspend_to_RAM) the file
"hibernate.conf" should make it possible to say which modules need to
be unloaded.
There is no need. Pm-utils is a frame-wo
On Di, 2009-10-27 at 16:33 +0800, b4283 wrote:
> Now it's only issue is to automated this umount+rmmod and modprobe
> +mount
> thing.
Using pm-utils it is quite easy to do such things:
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Pm-utils
There must be something similar for s2ram. According to the wiki
(h
I think I nailed it.
With luck, I was able to resume the computer with "s2ram -f -a 1", even
it's within Xorg. But it still takes a long time to resume, then I found
out about my drives hooked on an old IDE extension card stopped working.
So I removed the module "pata_hpt37x", and...
Wala, 11 sec
Still no luck with Pm-utils. It takes about a minute before the keyboard
lights and mouse leds to go on, and Caps-Lock key works, so it isn't
hanging.
I could use the SysRq method to reboot my system, so I guess maybe
everything is actually working -- except video. Using Ctrl-Alt-[1-7] to
switch
Alexander Lam 提到:
> My netbook (Intel Atom 1.6Ghz, 1GB ram) comes up from suspend-to-ram in
> about 3 seconds.
>
> I use pmutils to suspend.
So it's just me then. I've read the wiki about Pm-utils, but it isn't
very thorough though.
Trying it anyway.
My netbook (Intel Atom 1.6Ghz, 1GB ram) comes up from suspend-to-ram in
about 3 seconds.
I use pmutils to suspend.
--
Alexander Lam
Hi,
On Mo, 2009-10-26 at 23:58 +0800, b4283 wrote:
> My question is: What's the average resume time of yours, and is it
> possible to be any faster ?
It takes something like 10 seconds or so for me. I noticed that you are
using s2ram, have you tried to use pm-utils
(http://wiki.archlinux.org/inde
On 26.10.2009 16:58, b4283 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've had some nice experiences with Windows(XP)'s suspend functionality,
> and it seems to work on all machines I've worked with.
>
> and the other day I just had a successful resume on my machine with
> "s2ram -f -m -p", but it takes like a minute for it
Hi,
I've had some nice experiences with Windows(XP)'s suspend functionality,
and it seems to work on all machines I've worked with.
and the other day I just had a successful resume on my machine with
"s2ram -f -m -p", but it takes like a minute for it to fully recover to
a terminal (tty/1).
(ps:
10 matches
Mail list logo
