Re: [arch-general] Replacing journal completely with syslog-ng

2013-10-27 Thread Jan Alexander Steffens
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Dimitris Zervas wrote: > I have to say that I really hate journalctl. > But apart from that, I need syslog. > Journalctl requires too much resources (I have a 512MB KVM) and some times > it kicks the server out of memory. > Also, there is nearly no way to parse its

Re: [arch-general] Replacing journal completely with syslog-ng

2013-10-27 Thread Guus Snijders
Op 27 okt. 2013 19:42 schreef "Dimitris Zervas" het volgende: > > I have to say that I really hate journalctl. > But apart from that, I need syslog. [...] According to [1] journald has an option sendtosyslog. It might also be wise to keep a (small) journal available for those corner cases that wi

Re: [arch-general] Replacing journal completely with syslog-ng

2013-10-27 Thread Leonid Isaev
On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 18:41:36 +0200 Dimitris Zervas wrote: > I have to say that I really hate journalctl. > But apart from that, I need syslog. > Journalctl requires too much resources (I have a 512MB KVM) and some times > it kicks the server out of memory. I'm not sure what you mean. Does the sy

Re: [arch-general] Replacing journal completely with syslog-ng

2013-10-27 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2013-10-27 18:41:36 +0200] Dimitris Zervas: > Journalctl requires too much resources (I have a 512MB KVM) and some times > it kicks the server out of memory. Unless you can refine your description of the problem, we can do nothing to help than give suggestions blindly at random. Here's one: add t

[arch-general] Replacing journal completely with syslog-ng

2013-10-27 Thread Dimitris Zervas
I have to say that I really hate journalctl. But apart from that, I need syslog. Journalctl requires too much resources (I have a 512MB KVM) and some times it kicks the server out of memory. Also, there is nearly no way to parse its logs with any log analyzers, you have to do it the hackish way wit