On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 5:01 AM, Jonathan Vasquez
wrote:
> Btw, for the first picture, it says that /usr is not mounted. I
> believe that is because my /usr in in /dev/mapper/arch-usr and that
> doesn't get mounted until later in the boot process.
You should still get boot messages during boot ev
> I was reading this and it reminded me of what you said Anthony:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove
>
> --
> Jonathan Vasquez
I'm definitely going to be moving back to my old drive (with the old
partition style /dev/sda1 EF02, /dev/sda2 ALL LVM (Boot, /, , swap,
home)) and using ini
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 1:07 AM, Jonathan Vasquez
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:36 AM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Jonathan Vasquez
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Simplicity and minimalism would be what motivates me the most. If I
>>> don't need an initramfs to get my
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:36 AM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Jonathan Vasquez
> wrote:
>>
>> Simplicity and minimalism would be what motivates me the most. If I
>> don't need an initramfs to get my system boot up, why have one? I know
>> the benefits that initra
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Jonathan Vasquez
wrote:
>
> Simplicity and minimalism would be what motivates me the most. If I
> don't need an initramfs to get my system boot up, why have one? I know
> the benefits that initramfs provides, but I don't need any of them.
> All I need my computer
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:19 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Jonathan Vasquez
> wrote:
>> Btw, for the first picture, it says that /usr is not mounted. I
>> believe that is because my /usr in in /dev/mapper/arch-usr and that
>> doesn't get mounted until later in
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Jonathan Vasquez
wrote:
> Btw, for the first picture, it says that /usr is not mounted. I
> believe that is because my /usr in in /dev/mapper/arch-usr and that
> doesn't get mounted until later in the boot process.
>
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Jonathan Vasq
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 5:03 AM, Jonathan Vasquez
wrote:
> Is there any way to choose when to load specific stuff? In gentoo you
> could do this by selecting a runlevel by name (sysinit, boot, default,
> shutdown). I don't know if this is possible in Arch.
Not sure if that's what you're asking ab
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Jonathan Vasquez
wrote:
> Btw, for the first picture, it says that /usr is not mounted. I
> believe that is because my /usr in in /dev/mapper/arch-usr and that
> doesn't get mounted until later in the boot process.
>
> --
> Jonathan Vasquez
Is there any way to ch
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Karol Blazewicz
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Jonathan Vasquez
> wrote:
>> but should the initramfs be integrated enough into
>> the system where the output messages don't get displayed?)
>
> I think the initscripts produce what you see while booting
Btw, for the first picture, it says that /usr is not mounted. I
believe that is because my /usr in in /dev/mapper/arch-usr and that
doesn't get mounted until later in the boot process.
--
Jonathan Vasquez
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Jonathan Vasquez
wrote:
> but should the initramfs be integrated enough into
> the system where the output messages don't get displayed?)
I think the initscripts produce what you see while booting and
shutting down. Is there anything written to your /var/log/boot
>> Btw, there are nowadays many more reasons why using an initramfs is
>> preferred. By depending on initramfs, you can simplify system
>> initialization greatly. In the future, it is likely that booting a Linux
>> system without initramfs will only be possible in very simple cases - at
>> least th
>> When I compiled my custom kernel (from upstream, and yes I did enable
>> device mapper support compiled into the kernel, I've also experimented
>> with it as a module), the kernel fails to see the / partition.
>
> Short answer: It's not possible. The kernel is unable to scan for LVM
> and activa
Am 09.01.2012 04:58, schrieb Jonathan Vasquez:
> Hello everyone,
>
> So I've been experimenting on removing my use of initrd and using the
> kernel directly.
>
> My current setup is the following:
>
> GPT, LVM, GRUB2 (So I can boot my partitions that are inside the LVM).
>
> /dev/sda1 BIOS Boot
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:41 AM, Jan Steffens wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Jonathan Vasquez
> wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> So I've been experimenting on removing my use of initrd and using the
>> kernel directly.
>>
>> My current setup is the following:
>>
>> GPT, LVM, GRUB2 (So I
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Jonathan Vasquez wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> So I've been experimenting on removing my use of initrd and using the
> kernel directly.
>
> My current setup is the following:
>
> GPT, LVM, GRUB2 (So I can boot my partitions that are inside the LVM).
>
> /dev/sda1 BIO
Btw, If I do decide to go with the alternative layout, then I ask
myself what is the point of complicating my life and using GRUB2? If
the /boot and / will be on physical partitions, the only reason I see
to use GRUB2 is for the official GPT support (as oppose to GRUB-Legacy
patched GPT support).
Hello everyone,
So I've been experimenting on removing my use of initrd and using the
kernel directly.
My current setup is the following:
GPT, LVM, GRUB2 (So I can boot my partitions that are inside the LVM).
/dev/sda1 BIOS Boot Partition EF02 (GPT)
/dev/sda2 Linux LVM (named arch)
/dev/arch/b
19 matches
Mail list logo
