Re: [arch-general] Question about the license of opera

2009-04-27 Thread Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 1:02 AM, Allan McRae wrote: > >> Attila wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> i recognized that there is new package in aur for opera with this >>> informations: >>> >>> "This package is the official one from the [extra] repository. We have to >>> move >>

Re: [arch-general] Question about the license of opera

2009-04-27 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 1:02 AM, Allan McRae wrote: > Attila wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> i recognized that there is new package in aur for opera with this >> informations: >> >> "This package is the official one from the [extra] repository. We have to >> move >> it because of a unclear license issue. A

Re: [arch-general] Question about the license of opera

2009-04-26 Thread DrCR
"I can look at the license and then see what authority exists to either substantiate the concerns or provide the information showing that the concern is unjustified." Nah, not lawyer speak. Just educated english speak. ;p On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Allan McRae wrote: > David C. Rankin wrot

Re: [arch-general] Question about the license of opera

2009-04-25 Thread Andrei Thorp
Very nice to have a laywer around the mailing lists though... :) -AT On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 4:08 AM, Attila wrote: > On Samstag, 25. April 2009 08:02 Allan McRae wrote: > >> No.  Only the ones where it is unclear if we can legally distribute it. > > Thanks for the information. > > See you, Atti

Re: [arch-general] Question about the license of opera

2009-04-25 Thread Attila
On Samstag, 25. April 2009 08:02 Allan McRae wrote: > No.  Only the ones where it is unclear if we can legally distribute it. Thanks for the information. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Question about the license of opera

2009-04-25 Thread Allan McRae
David C. Rankin wrote: Allan McRae wrote: Attila wrote: Hi, i recognized that there is new package in aur for opera with this informations: "This package is the official one from the [extra] repository. We have to move it because of a unclear license issue. After we have clarify this

Re: [arch-general] Question about the license of opera

2009-04-25 Thread David C. Rankin
Allan McRae wrote: > Attila wrote: >> Hi, >> >> i recognized that there is new package in aur for opera with this >> informations: >> >> "This package is the official one from the [extra] repository. We have >> to move >> it because of a unclear license issue. After we have clarify this >> issue th

Re: [arch-general] Question about the license of opera

2009-04-24 Thread Allan McRae
Attila wrote: Hi, i recognized that there is new package in aur for opera with this informations: "This package is the official one from the [extra] repository. We have to move it because of a unclear license issue. After we have clarify this issue the package will be back in the repos or not.

[arch-general] Question about the license of opera

2009-04-24 Thread Attila
Hi, i recognized that there is new package in aur for opera with this informations: "This package is the official one from the [extra] repository. We have to move it because of a unclear license issue. After we have clarify this issue the package will be back in the repos or not. It should not be