Re: [arch-general] Pruning the bugtracker

2011-05-08 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Wed, 4 May 2011 20:43:27 +0200, JM wrote: > I have browsed through all High and Medium severity bugreports and > categorized some of them here: > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Fijam . Maybe we should also consider a more aggressive approach. There are currently more than 600 open bu

Re: [arch-general] Pruning the bugtracker

2011-05-06 Thread Ángel Velásquez
2011/5/6 Yclept Nemo : > Speaking for the bugs I watch: > https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/15746 > FS#15746 - [kismet] should be built "make suidinstall" > Should be simple enough to take a decision. > I will get ride of this bug .. -- Angel Velásquez angvp @ irc.freenode.net Arch Linux Develope

Re: [arch-general] Pruning the bugtracker

2011-05-06 Thread Yclept Nemo
Speaking for the bugs I watch: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/15746 FS#15746 - [kismet] should be built "make suidinstall" Should be simple enough to take a decision.

Re: [arch-general] Pruning the bugtracker

2011-05-06 Thread JM
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > On 05/04/2011 09:35 PM, JM wrote: >> >> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis >>  wrote: >>> >>> JM  wrote: I have browsed through all High and Medium severity bugreports and categorized some of them here:

Re: [arch-general] Pruning the bugtracker

2011-05-05 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On 05/04/2011 09:35 PM, JM wrote: On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: JM wrote: I have browsed through all High and Medium severity bugreports and categorized some of them here: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Fijam . 'Candidates for closing' are divided into

Re: [arch-general] Pruning the bugtracker

2011-05-04 Thread JM
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > JM wrote: >> I have browsed through all High and Medium severity bugreports and >> categorized some of them here: >> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Fijam . >> >> 'Candidates for closing' are divided into two categories: strong

Re: [arch-general] Pruning the bugtracker

2011-05-04 Thread Grigorios Bouzakis
JM wrote: > I have browsed through all High and Medium severity bugreports and > categorized some of them here: > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Fijam . > > 'Candidates for closing' are divided into two categories: strong and > weak. Strong candidates have not been replied to in over 4

[arch-general] Pruning the bugtracker

2011-05-04 Thread JM
I have browsed through all High and Medium severity bugreports and categorized some of them here: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Fijam . 'Candidates for closing' are divided into two categories: strong and weak. Strong candidates have not been replied to in over 4 months (with some bugs