LoneVVolf on Thu, 2016/05/19 17:24:
> On 14-05-16 01:15, Carsten Feuls wrote:
> > Hello Everybody,
> >
> > I have some trouble with pacman hooks.
> > Arch is going to use pacman hooks in every package.
> > etckeeper was one of the first package that use pacman hooks, without any
> > trouble.
> > B
On 14-05-16 01:15, Carsten Feuls wrote:
Hello Everybody,
I have some trouble with pacman hooks.
Arch is going to use pacman hooks in every package.
etckeeper was one of the first package that use pacman hooks, without any
trouble.
But now it becomes more tricky to run.
My Problem is that the pac
Carsten Feuls on Sat, 2016/05/14 01:15:
> Hello Everybody,
>
> I have some trouble with pacman hooks.
> Arch is going to use pacman hooks in every package.
> etckeeper was one of the first package that use pacman hooks, without any
> trouble.
> But now it becomes more tricky to run.
> My Problem
2016-05-14 1:15 GMT+02:00 Carsten Feuls :
>
> I have tested to rename the etckeeper-post-install.hook to
> "99-etckeeper-post-
> install.hook" but it does not help, because numbers run before characters.
>
Well, the obvious solution is to rename it to "zz-etckeeper..", but of
course that also isn'
On 14-05-16 01:15, Carsten Feuls wrote:
Hello Everybody,
I have some trouble with pacman hooks.
Arch is going to use pacman hooks in every package.
etckeeper was one of the first package that use pacman hooks, without any
trouble.
But now it becomes more tricky to run.
My Problem is that the pac
Hello Everybody,
I have some trouble with pacman hooks.
Arch is going to use pacman hooks in every package.
etckeeper was one of the first package that use pacman hooks, without any
trouble.
But now it becomes more tricky to run.
My Problem is that the pacman hooks run in alphabetic order.
And no
6 matches
Mail list logo
