Re: [arch-general] OpenJFX package out-of-date

2017-02-06 Thread Kyle Laker
Sorry, I thought I had gotten a successful build in my attempts, but I apparently was mistaken. I certainly got the sources to download, though. In any case, I apologize that the patch I provided was incomplete and not thoroughly tested. I appreciate the work you did to get a successful update of t

Re: [arch-general] OpenJFX package out-of-date

2017-02-06 Thread Guillaume ALAUX
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 10:19 PM, Guillaume ALAUX wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Kyle Laker wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> The extra/java-openjfx package has been flagged out-of-date since >> 2016-09-13 and is stuck at verison 8u76-b03. This can result in >> runtime warnings for some JavaFX

Re: [arch-general] OpenJFX package out-of-date

2017-01-30 Thread Guillaume ALAUX
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Kyle Laker wrote: > > Hello, > > The extra/java-openjfx package has been flagged out-of-date since > 2016-09-13 and is stuck at verison 8u76-b03. This can result in > runtime warnings for some JavaFX applications whose FXML was created > specifying a newer API vers

[arch-general] OpenJFX package out-of-date

2017-01-30 Thread Kyle Laker
Hello, The extra/java-openjfx package has been flagged out-of-date since 2016-09-13 and is stuck at verison 8u76-b03. This can result in runtime warnings for some JavaFX applications whose FXML was created specifying a newer API version, potentially causing confusion for users because `java -vers