Re: [arch-general] Need help understanding meta-PKGBUILDs

2011-02-02 Thread David C. Rankin
On 02/02/2011 02:52 PM, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote: >> I don't see why you need meta packages; groups should do fine. I >> > think the only reason that Arch's meta packages exist is to provide an >> > upgrade path from the pre-splitpkg KDE days. >> > > Except that when you install a group, if

Re: [arch-general] Need help understanding meta-PKGBUILDs

2011-02-02 Thread Jérôme M. Berger
Tavian Barnes wrote: > On 2 February 2011 01:10, David C. Rankin > wrote: >> On 02/01/2011 10:41 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: >>> (3) Lastly, if anybody has interest, please look over the PKGBUILDs and >>> let me >>> know where I'm doing something stupid. I have done quite a bit of reading >>> t

Re: [arch-general] Need help understanding meta-PKGBUILDs

2011-02-02 Thread Thomas S Hatch
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Tavian Barnes wrote: > On 2 February 2011 13:25, Thomas S Hatch wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Tavian Barnes < > taviana...@tavianator.com>wrote: > > > >> On 2 February 2011 01:10, David C. Rankin > >> wrote: > >> > On 02/01/2011 10:41 PM, David C. R

Re: [arch-general] Need help understanding meta-PKGBUILDs

2011-02-02 Thread Tavian Barnes
On 2 February 2011 13:25, Thomas S Hatch wrote: > On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Tavian Barnes > wrote: > >> On 2 February 2011 01:10, David C. Rankin >> wrote: >> > On 02/01/2011 10:41 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: >> >> (3)   Lastly, if anybody has interest, please look over the PKGBUILDs >> an

Re: [arch-general] Need help understanding meta-PKGBUILDs

2011-02-02 Thread Thomas S Hatch
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Tavian Barnes wrote: > On 2 February 2011 01:10, David C. Rankin > wrote: > > On 02/01/2011 10:41 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > >> (3) Lastly, if anybody has interest, please look over the PKGBUILDs > and let me > >> know where I'm doing something stupid. I have

Re: [arch-general] Need help understanding meta-PKGBUILDs

2011-02-02 Thread Tavian Barnes
On 2 February 2011 01:10, David C. Rankin wrote: > On 02/01/2011 10:41 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: >> (3)   Lastly, if anybody has interest, please look over the PKGBUILDs and >> let me >> know where I'm doing something stupid. I have done quite a bit of reading >> trying >> to digest PKGBUILDs a

Re: [arch-general] Need help understanding meta-PKGBUILDs

2011-02-01 Thread David C. Rankin
On 02/01/2011 10:41 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > (3) Lastly, if anybody has interest, please look over the PKGBUILDs and let > me > know where I'm doing something stupid. I have done quite a bit of reading > trying > to digest PKGBUILDs and how to apply them to a large project like Trinity. I >

[arch-general] Need help understanding meta-PKGBUILDs

2011-02-01 Thread David C. Rankin
Guys, We have made good progress refining the basics for Trinity PKGBUILDs. The trinity/dependencies PKGBUILDs are working for tqtinterface and arts. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Trinity#Development_PKGBUILDs They have been reworked to conform with the kde4 (kde-meta) PKGBUILD st