On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:22:12 -0600
Aaron Griffin wrote:
> Back on topic:
> One user talking on an ML does not make a package important. I have
> not yet run into a site that requires moonlight/silverlight. So, until
> we're actually going to get usage out of this package, putting it in
> extra is
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Denis Alessandro Altoe Falqueto
wrote:
>
> Funny you say that... Looking over the Moonlight homepage, there is
> the Microsoft covenant for not sueing who uses it. The first paragraph
> is very "interesting":
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/interop/msnovellcollab/moon
stop spamming the list and my inbox:
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILD
thnaks
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Amanai wrote:
>>
>> I gotta say, even with all the usual MS distrust that I've been
>> carrying around since MS-DOS 3.x, on the surface Moonlight looks much
>> more promising than the clusterfsck that is Flash. I'd be interested
>> in at least giving it a shot.
>>
Amani, your posts to this list are now moderated. I will review them
all for insults before approving them. Try to be civil, please,
especially when you're asking other people to do work for you.
Back on topic:
One user talking on an ML does not make a package important. I have
not yet run into a
stefan-husm...@t-online.de schrieb:
I agree perfectly. But it would be the correct way to handle things
like that, and would put some noise away from this list.
BTW, the new rules for the TUs would even forbid to put it to
community without discussion. The devs might have some similar rules f
Amanai schrieb:
I pick this up. I don't want to build it and upload moonlight for AUR. I
don't want to use any packages from AUR.
Then pay someone to do it. Seriously, what kind of attitude is that?
I'm not generally against using moonlight, but the usual way for a
package inside Arch is thro
-Original Message-
> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:09:44 +0100
> Subject: Re: [arch-general] Moonlight 1.0
> From: Amanai
> To: "General Discusson about Arch Linux"
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:39:40 -0800, stefan-husm...@t-online.de
> wrote:
>
> > Hello
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:39:40 -0800, stefan-husm...@t-online.de
wrote:
Hello,
I agree perfectly. But it would be the correct way to handle things
like that, and would put some noise away from this list.
BTW, the new rules for the TUs would even forbid to put it to
community without discussi
-Original Message-
> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:05:47 +0100
> Subject: Re: [arch-general] Moonlight 1.0
> From: Allan McRae
> To: General Discusson about Arch Linux
> stefan-husm...@t-online.de wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> >
> > > D
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> stefan-husm...@t-online.de wrote:
>>
>> -Original Message-
>>
>>>
>>> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:28:36 +0100
>>> Subject: Re: [arch-general] Moonlight 1.0
>>> From: Amanai
>&g
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Amanai wrote:
> The final Version from Moonlight 1.0 released on January 20th. Will this be
> avaible in the Archlinux repo's extra?
>
> http://www.go-mono.com/moonlight/
>
> Moonlight is an open source implementation of Microsoft Silverlight for Unix
> systems. I
Amanai,
The question: do you use any packages from community repo?
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Amanai wrote:
>
>>
>> Why not just installing the xpi-file for Firefox directly from the mono
>> project? It works really great. Ok, it's not compiled from source, but
>> it's available for i586 a
Why not just installing the xpi-file for Firefox directly from the mono
project? It works really great. Ok, it's not compiled from source, but
it's available for i586 and x86_64.
See here: http://www.go-mono.com/moonlight/
Daniel
I am using Opera! Moonlight works really great with Opera t
stefan-husm...@t-online.de wrote:
-Original Message-
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:28:36 +0100
Subject: Re: [arch-general] Moonlight 1.0
From: Amanai
To: "General Discusson about Arch Linux"
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:19:55 -0800, Thomas Bohn
wrote:
On 01:25, Thu
On Thu, January 22, 2009 12:28 pm, Amanai wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:19:55 -0800, Thomas Bohn
> wrote:
>
>> On 01:25, Thu 22 Jan 09, Amanai wrote:
>>
>>> The final Version from Moonlight 1.0 released on January 20th. Will
>>> this
>>> be avaible in the Archlinux repo's extra?
>>
>> Currently
-Original Message-
> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:28:36 +0100
> Subject: Re: [arch-general] Moonlight 1.0
> From: Amanai
> To: "General Discusson about Arch Linux"
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:19:55 -0800, Thomas Bohn
> wrote:
>
> > On 01:25, Thu 22
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:19:55 -0800, Thomas Bohn wrote:
On 01:25, Thu 22 Jan 09, Amanai wrote:
The final Version from Moonlight 1.0 released on January 20th. Will this
be avaible in the Archlinux repo's extra?
Currently the SVN version of Moonlight is available via AUR, the package
is called
On 01:25, Thu 22 Jan 09, Amanai wrote:
> The final Version from Moonlight 1.0 released on January 20th. Will this
> be avaible in the Archlinux repo's extra?
Currently the SVN version of Moonlight is available via AUR, the package
is called "moon-svn."
Thomas
Amanai wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 01:57:26 -0800, RedShift wrote:
Amanai wrote:
The final Version from Moonlight 1.0 released on January 20th. Will
this be avaible in the Archlinux repo's extra?
http://www.go-mono.com/moonlight/
Moonlight is an open source implementation of Microsoft Silve
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 01:57:26 -0800, RedShift wrote:
Amanai wrote:
The final Version from Moonlight 1.0 released on January 20th. Will
this be avaible in the Archlinux repo's extra?
http://www.go-mono.com/moonlight/
Moonlight is an open source implementation of Microsoft Silverlight
for U
Amanai wrote:
The final Version from Moonlight 1.0 released on January 20th. Will this
be avaible in the Archlinux repo's extra?
http://www.go-mono.com/moonlight/
Moonlight is an open source implementation of Microsoft Silverlight for
Unix systems. It's avaible for 32/64 bit!
Release Notes
The final Version from Moonlight 1.0 released on January 20th. Will this
be avaible in the Archlinux repo's extra?
http://www.go-mono.com/moonlight/
Moonlight is an open source implementation of Microsoft Silverlight for
Unix systems. It's avaible for 32/64 bit!
Release Notes
Final release
23 matches
Mail list logo
