On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:56:39 -0500, Aaron Griffin
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Ananda Samaddar
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 23:19:09 +0200
>>> Linas wrote:
>>>
I assume this ask to have GFDL & CC-BY-SA content coexist
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Ananda Samaddar wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 21:53:04 -0400
> Loui Chang wrote:
>
>> On Wed 30 Jun 2010 00:15 +0100, Ananda Samaddar wrote:
>> > On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:56:39 -0500
>> > Aaron Griffin wrote:
>> > > I was also waiting for someone more knowledgeable w
No Objections from my side
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 21:53:04 -0400
Loui Chang wrote:
> On Wed 30 Jun 2010 00:15 +0100, Ananda Samaddar wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:56:39 -0500
> > Aaron Griffin wrote:
> > > I was also waiting for someone more knowledgeable with regards to
> > > the wiki.
> > >
> > > If it's my say-so you
On Wed 30 Jun 2010 00:15 +0100, Ananda Samaddar wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:56:39 -0500
> Aaron Griffin wrote:
> > I was also waiting for someone more knowledgeable with regards to the
> > wiki.
> >
> > If it's my say-so you want, I don't see a problem with adding
> > *additional* content und
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:56:39 -0500
Aaron Griffin wrote:
> I was also waiting for someone more knowledgeable with regards to the
> wiki.
>
> If it's my say-so you want, I don't see a problem with adding
> *additional* content under CC. But switching all *existing* content to
> CC might be a probl
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Ananda Samaddar
> wrote:
>> On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 23:19:09 +0200
>> Linas wrote:
>>
>>> I assume this ask to have GFDL & CC-BY-SA content coexist at the
>>> wiki. The existing content can only be relicensed by it
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Ananda Samaddar wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 23:19:09 +0200
> Linas wrote:
>
>> I assume this ask to have GFDL & CC-BY-SA content coexist at the
>> wiki. The existing content can only be relicensed by its authors. The
>> GFDL 1.3 gateway
>> expired on August 1, 20
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 23:19:09 +0200
Linas wrote:
> I assume this ask to have GFDL & CC-BY-SA content coexist at the
> wiki. The existing content can only be relicensed by its authors. The
> GFDL 1.3 gateway
> expired on August 1, 2009.
>
I really need an answer on this as soon as possible. For
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:17:38 -0400
Loui Chang wrote:
> On Thu 17 Jun 2010 21:42 +0100, Ananda Samaddar wrote:
> > I notice it's all under GFDL 1.2. I'm wanting to use a Gentoo doc
> > for the Arch Security stuff but it's under a CC-SA attribution
> > license which is incompatible with GFDL. Woul
Ananda Samaddar wrote:
> I notice it's all under GFDL 1.2. I'm wanting to use a Gentoo doc
> for the Arch Security stuff but it's under a CC-SA attribution license
> which is incompatible with GFDL. Would it be possible to allow Wiki
> content under a CC licenses? I can't see it being too controve
On Thu 17 Jun 2010 21:42 +0100, Ananda Samaddar wrote:
> I notice it's all under GFDL 1.2. I'm wanting to use a Gentoo doc
> for the Arch Security stuff but it's under a CC-SA attribution license
> which is incompatible with GFDL. Would it be possible to allow Wiki
> content under a CC licenses? I
I notice it's all under GFDL 1.2. I'm wanting to use a Gentoo doc
for the Arch Security stuff but it's under a CC-SA attribution license
which is incompatible with GFDL. Would it be possible to allow Wiki
content under a CC licenses? I can't see it being too controversial a
choice, as in CC licens
13 matches
Mail list logo
