Re: [arch-general] LVM on LUKS and fsck

2012-05-05 Thread Sorin-Mihai Vârgolici
On 06.05.2012 09:02, Jayesh Badwaik wrote: It is there in LVM, not sure about encrypted LVM though. You have both /dev/lvmgroup/lvmvolume and /dev/mapper/lvmgroup-lvmvolume. The /dev/lvmgroup/lvmvolume is a softlink to /dev/dm-x where x is the appropriate number. Is the same on encrypted LVM,

Re: [arch-general] LVM on LUKS and fsck

2012-05-05 Thread Jayesh Badwaik
On Sunday 06 May 2012 06:53:42 Sorin-Mihai Vârgolici wrote: > In ~4 years of using encrypted lvm, I never saw that /dev/lvmvol thing. > I can't figure how you managed to create it and use it in your > config(s). Usually is something like /dev/mapper/lvmgroup-lvmvolume. Are > you sure that LVM was c

Re: [arch-general] LVM on LUKS and fsck

2012-05-05 Thread Christian Hesse
Mauro Santos on Sun, 2012/05/06 03:16: > I have decided to give encryption a shot and I have started with some > bootable usb disks I have as emergency/recovery media. > > Everything works and partitions seem to mount just fine, but during boot > in the fsck fase, root is apparently checked twice

Re: [arch-general] LVM on LUKS and fsck

2012-05-05 Thread Sorin-Mihai Vârgolici
In ~4 years of using encrypted lvm, I never saw that /dev/lvmvol thing. I can't figure how you managed to create it and use it in your config(s). Usually is something like /dev/mapper/lvmgroup-lvmvolume. Are you sure that LVM was created corectly? Did the system ever boot fine? -- <>< Sorin-Mi

[arch-general] LVM on LUKS and fsck

2012-05-05 Thread Mauro Santos
I have decided to give encryption a shot and I have started with some bootable usb disks I have as emergency/recovery media. Everything works and partitions seem to mount just fine, but during boot in the fsck fase, root is apparently checked twice and home apparently doesn't get checked. root: c