Re: [arch-general] Kernel 2.6.32 Broken

2010-01-01 Thread Robert Howard
I always expect problems with my setup when updating with more than just a bugfix release kernel, but no issues with this one. This is a workstation with 8-cores, a finicky motherboard and screwball lvm+raid setup. Never used testing either. Another great job by the Arch devs. On Dec 31, 2009 6:2

Re: [arch-general] Kernel 2.6.32 Broken

2009-12-31 Thread Attila
At Donnerstag, 31. Dezember 2009 03:51 Chris Brannon wrote: >> If you, too, don't use [testing] and get kernel panics then this is >> because there is at least one important package update which is needed >> by kernel26 2.6.32.2-2 missing in [core]. I guess it's mkinitcpio. If >> you update your s

Re: [arch-general] Kernel 2.6.32 Broken

2009-12-31 Thread Chuck Hallenbeck
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 09:50:26AM +, Paulo Santos wrote: > Chris Brannon wrote: > > Heiko Baums writes: > >> If you, too, don't use [testing] and get kernel panics then this is > >> because there is at least one important package update which is needed > >> by kernel26 2.6.32.2-2 missing in [

Re: [arch-general] Kernel 2.6.32 Broken

2009-12-31 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Am Donnerstag 31 Dezember 2009 schrieb Paulo Santos: > Chris Brannon wrote: > > Heiko Baums writes: > >> If you, too, don't use [testing] and get kernel panics then this is > >> because there is at least one important package update which is needed > >> by kernel26 2.6.32.2-2 missing in [core]. I

Re: [arch-general] Kernel 2.6.32 Broken

2009-12-31 Thread Paulo Santos
Chris Brannon wrote: > Heiko Baums writes: >> If you, too, don't use [testing] and get kernel panics then this is >> because there is at least one important package update which is needed >> by kernel26 2.6.32.2-2 missing in [core]. I guess it's mkinitcpio. If >> you update your system to [testing

Re: [arch-general] Kernel 2.6.32 Broken

2009-12-30 Thread Chris Brannon
Heiko Baums writes: > If you, too, don't use [testing] and get kernel panics then this is > because there is at least one important package update which is needed > by kernel26 2.6.32.2-2 missing in [core]. I guess it's mkinitcpio. If > you update your system to [testing] then it works again. I'm

Re: [arch-general] Kernel 2.6.32 Broken

2009-12-30 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Wed, 30 Dec 2009 18:54:16 -0700 schrieb Steve Holmes : > Hey, has anyone been experiencing any problems with the newest > kernel26 package from Arch? this would be 2.6.32.2. After upgrading > to it, my machine starts to boot but then dies. When I downgrade to > kernel26-2.6.31.6, all works fi

[arch-general] Kernel 2.6.32 Broken

2009-12-30 Thread Steve Holmes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Hey, has anyone been experiencing any problems with the newest kernel26 package from Arch? this would be 2.6.32.2. After upgrading to it, my machine starts to boot but then dies. When I downgrade to kernel26-2.6.31.6, all works fine again. I'm