2008/2/8, Stefano Esposito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Well... I think I'll contribute to that on archlinux-projects and drop
> mine bindings :) Is the project still active? And who's the author (i'm
> not able to find (s)he on archlinux-projects.org :))
>
Georg Grabler was a TU but resigned due to li
On Feb 8, 2008 11:11 AM, Stefano Esposito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well... I think I'll contribute to that on archlinux-projects and drop
> mine bindings :) Is the project still active? And who's the author (i'm
> not able to find (s)he on archlinux-projects.org :))
>
>
It's not really activ
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 19:31:18 +0100
Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stefano Esposito wrote:
> > On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 15:18:24 +0100
> > solsTiCe d'Hiver<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> hi.
> >>> IMHO, at the actually status of pacman, is a suicide go to
> >>> programming a GUI.
> >> what do y
Comments below !!:
> On Wednesday 06 February 2008 20:24, Xavier wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > Hey Nigel and the gang;
>> >
>> > Well, I *think* that unless someone wants to re-write and maintain
>> jacman, you would be best advised to not use it.
>> >
>> > I would suggest 'yaourt' as a
Nigel Henry wrote:
Question again:
Should I send a bug report to the jacman maintainer?
You could at least contact him to know if he still has the intention to
update jacman, as he said on bbs 6 months ago ;)
On Wednesday 06 February 2008 20:24, Xavier wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hey Nigel and the gang;
> >
> > Well, I *think* that unless someone wants to re-write and maintain
> > jacman, you would be best advised to not use it.
> >
> > I would suggest 'yaourt' as a replacement. It works very
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 20:20 +0100, Xavier wrote:
> Timm Preetz wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 19:31 +0100, Xavier wrote:
> >> Hm, do we have 2 pyalpm now?
> >> http://svn.berlios.de/svnroot/repos/pyalpm/trunk/
> >> http://svn.archlinux-projects.org/repos/pyalpm/trunk/src/
> >>
> >
> > Counted th
Timm Preetz wrote:
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 19:31 +0100, Xavier wrote:
Hm, do we have 2 pyalpm now?
http://svn.berlios.de/svnroot/repos/pyalpm/trunk/
http://svn.archlinux-projects.org/repos/pyalpm/trunk/src/
Counted this in?
http://projects.archlinux.org/git/?p=pacman.git;a=tree;f=lib/libalpm;
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 19:31 +0100, Xavier wrote:
> Hm, do we have 2 pyalpm now?
> http://svn.berlios.de/svnroot/repos/pyalpm/trunk/
> http://svn.archlinux-projects.org/repos/pyalpm/trunk/src/
>
Counted this in?
http://projects.archlinux.org/git/?p=pacman.git;a=tree;f=lib/libalpm;
;)
That's pro
Stefano Esposito wrote:
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 15:18:24 +0100
solsTiCe d'Hiver<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi.
IMHO, at the actually status of pacman, is a suicide go to
programming a GUI.
what do you mean by that ?
i wonder why after pacman is finally splitted into two with a library
like libalp
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 15:18:24 +0100
solsTiCe d'Hiver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi.
> > IMHO, at the actually status of pacman, is a suicide go to
> > programming a GUI.
>
> what do you mean by that ?
>
> i wonder why after pacman is finally splitted into two with a library
> like libalpm, we d
hi.
> IMHO, at the actually status of pacman, is a suicide go to programming a
> GUI.
what do you mean by that ?
i wonder why after pacman is finally splitted into two with a library like
libalpm, we do not see more GUI popping up...
i have tried to use libalpm just to see; it's not easy but i
Rodrigo Coacci wrote:
On Feb 7, 2008 9:15 AM, DaNiMoTh<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IMHO, at the actually status of pacman, is a suicide go to programming a
GUI.
That's exactly why I gave up in a gtk frontend for alpm
The real question is what did you do for fixing it (or helping to fix
On Feb 7, 2008 9:15 AM, DaNiMoTh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/2/6, Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > [cut]
> > Also, GtkPacman development is started again.
> >
>
> Uhu, we have also paKman ( or YAPG ), a KDE frontend, that is actually
> abandoned. If anyone is interested on development
2008/2/6, Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [cut]
> Also, GtkPacman development is started again.
>
Uhu, we have also paKman ( or YAPG ), a KDE frontend, that is actually
abandoned. If anyone is interested on development, this is the page:
http://www.brainspace.it/?p=12 ( only in italian, but
> On Feb 6, 2008 12:01 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I would suggest 'yaourt' as a replacement. It works very nicely here
>> for what I need out of such a program, and it is being actively
>> maintained as pacman evolves.
>
> I fail to see how yaourt is in any way a replacement for jacman.
>
On Feb 6, 2008 12:01 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would suggest 'yaourt' as a replacement. It works very nicely here for
> what I need out of such a program, and it is being actively maintained as
> pacman evolves.
I fail to see how yaourt is in any way a replacement for jacman.
jacman is a
2008/2/6, Timm Preetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 14:01 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > P.S.. Jacman is a great idea, so *IF* someone brings it up to date, I am
> > sure it would be VERY popular.
>
> I would suggest spending the time on a PackageKit backend instead.
>
> That
On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 14:01 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> P.S.. Jacman is a great idea, so *IF* someone brings it up to date, I am
> sure it would be VERY popular.
I would suggest spending the time on a PackageKit backend instead.
That would probably more useful, as the GUI part is already d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Nigel and the gang;
Well, I *think* that unless someone wants to re-write and maintain jacman,
you would be best advised to not use it.
I would suggest 'yaourt' as a replacement. It works very nicely here for
what I need out of such a program, and it is being active
Hey Nigel and the gang;
Well, I *think* that unless someone wants to re-write and maintain jacman,
you would be best advised to not use it.
I would suggest 'yaourt' as a replacement. It works very nicely here for
what I need out of such a program, and it is being actively maintained as
pacman evo
Jacman hasn't worked properly, as regards installing packages since I
installed don't panic. Saying that I have been able to install the odd single
package, that has no deps, but as of today, even installing single packages
(alsaplayer as an example) fails.
Jacman opens ok, and I click on "Inst
22 matches
Mail list logo
