On 9 May 2014 00:22, Daniel Micay wrote:
> You already made it quite personal by promoting FUD with gems like this:
>
>> systemd's team is noticeably chauvinistic
Good grace, you pasted a quote I didn't make and made it appear as
mine or as if I approved it, whilst I was very careful about which
On 09/05/14 02:02 AM, Mark Lee wrote:
> On 05/09/2014 01:41 AM, Daniel Micay wrote:
>> On 09/05/14 01:29 AM, Mark Lee wrote:
>>>
>>> To Daniel,
>>>
>>> I'm pointing out that respect for people shouldn't affect technical
>>> skepticism. People can rant against whomever they want as long as it has
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/09/2014 01:41 AM, Daniel Micay wrote:
> On 09/05/14 01:29 AM, Mark Lee wrote:
>>
>> To Daniel,
>>
>> I'm pointing out that respect for people shouldn't affect technical
>> skepticism. People can rant against whomever they want as long as it has
On 09/05/14 01:29 AM, Mark Lee wrote:
>
> To Daniel,
>
> I'm pointing out that respect for people shouldn't affect technical
> skepticism. People can rant against whomever they want as long as it has
> technical criticism (at least on this mailing list).
Accusing the developers of bad faith and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/09/2014 01:22 AM, Daniel Micay wrote:
> On 09/05/14 01:01 AM, Mark Lee wrote:
>>
>> To all,
>>
>> Don't make any of this personal. In addition, I hope the inclusion of
>> systemd in Arch Linux has more justification than just some Arch
>> devel
On 09/05/14 01:01 AM, Mark Lee wrote:
>
> To all,
>
> Don't make any of this personal. In addition, I hope the inclusion of
> systemd in Arch Linux has more justification than just some Arch
> developers are also Systemd developers. Arch may not be a democracy, but
> it's not supposed to be infes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/08/2014 05:22 PM, Daniel Micay wrote:
> On 08/05/14 05:10 PM, Christos Nouskas wrote:
>>> I guess you'll be upset that Tom (one of the Arch developers) wrote
>>> systemd-networkd.
>>
>> You guess wrong.
>
> So you're okay with it providing net
Op 8 mei 2014 21:41 schreef "Daniel Micay" het
volgende:
>
[...]
>
> and a systemd-timesyncd for basic NTP clients not needing a full blown
> server with complicated RTC handling.
Just for the record: that is what is called sntp (Simple ntp). Ntp is about
clock sync, sntp just sets the clock.
As
On 08/05/14 03:40 PM, Daniel Micay wrote:
>
>> [0] http://boycottsystemd.org/
>
> There are no facts there. I already responded to this FUD on reddit:
> http://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/24zj10/what_are_the_benefits_of_partitioning_disk_space/chcao5u
>
Whoops, wrong link:
http://www.re
On 08/05/14 05:37 PM, Christos Nouskas wrote:
> Do accept the fact that not everyone is content with everything
> systemd and just leave it at that. Thank you and bye.
That can be expressed without calling the developers chauvanistic and
spreading misinformation. It's yet a free software project a
Do accept the fact that not everyone is content with everything
systemd and just leave it at that. Thank you and bye.
--
X
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?SeB=m&K=nous
http://tiny.cc/linux-pf
On 08/05/14 05:10 PM, Christos Nouskas wrote:
>> I guess you'll be upset that Tom (one of the Arch developers) wrote
>> systemd-networkd.
>
> You guess wrong.
So you're okay with it providing networking, but not timer units? Timer
units were a very simple addition on top of the existing event loo
> I guess you'll be upset that Tom (one of the Arch developers) wrote
> systemd-networkd.
You guess wrong.
> You'll probably also be upset that there's going to be
> a simple systemd-console from the kmscon developer (who is an Arch user)
> and a systemd-timesyncd for basic NTP clients not needin
On 08/05/14 05:01 PM, Nowaker wrote:
>>> This is not a rant against Arch or its devs and community, but against
>>> systemd; the sad facts speak for themselves.
>
>> This is a rant against the Arch devs and the Arch community. Several of
>> the developers and several people involved with the commu
This is not a rant against Arch or its devs and community, but against
systemd; the sad facts speak for themselves.
This is a rant against the Arch devs and the Arch community. Several of
the developers and several people involved with the community are
systemd developers, and there is certainl
On 08/05/14 03:46 AM, Christos Nouskas wrote:
> On 8 May 2014 09:43, Olivier Langlois wrote:
>> Since a recent update (I have first noticed a couple of weeks ago this
>> new systemd enhancement), systemd started to automatically clean /tmp
>> directory daily. This is not something that I like as I
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 03:44:51PM +, LANGLOIS Olivier PIS -EXT wrote:
> I was forecasting that this comment would come when I wrote the
> original request. While I agree with what you say, I think that it is
> reasonable to let the user have the control over when it is cleaned.
> Without denat
On 08/05/14 11:44 AM, LANGLOIS Olivier PIS -EXT wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: arch-general [mailto:arch-general-boun...@archlinux.org] On Behalf
>> Of Lukas Jirkovsky
>> Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 3:54 AM
>>
>> Please don't start another systemd flamewar. And BTW, automatic /tmp
>
Hi,
On Thu, 08 May 2014 02:43:57 -0400
Olivier Langlois wrote:
> Since a recent update (I have first noticed a couple of weeks ago this
> new systemd enhancement), systemd started to automatically clean /tmp
> directory daily. This is not something that I like as I prefer to decide
> when to cle
> -Original Message-
> From: arch-general [mailto:arch-general-boun...@archlinux.org] On Behalf
> Of Lukas Jirkovsky
> Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 3:54 AM
>
> Please don't start another systemd flamewar. And BTW, automatic /tmp
> cleaning was there since the beginning.
I agree to not star
On Thursday 08 May 2014 09:53:41 Lukas Jirkovsky wrote:
> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Christos Nouskas wrote:
> > On 8 May 2014 09:43, Olivier Langlois wrote:
> >> Since a recent update (I have first noticed a couple of weeks ago this
> >> new systemd enhancement), systemd started to automati
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Christos Nouskas wrote:
> On 8 May 2014 09:43, Olivier Langlois wrote:
>> Since a recent update (I have first noticed a couple of weeks ago this
>> new systemd enhancement), systemd started to automatically clean /tmp
>> directory daily. This is not something that
On 8 May 2014 09:43, Olivier Langlois wrote:
> Since a recent update (I have first noticed a couple of weeks ago this
> new systemd enhancement), systemd started to automatically clean /tmp
> directory daily. This is not something that I like as I prefer to decide
> when to clean up and to manuall
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Olivier Langlois <
oliv...@olivierlanglois.net> wrote:
> Since a recent update (I have first noticed a couple of weeks ago this
> new systemd enhancement), systemd started to automatically clean /tmp
> directory daily. This is not something that I like as I prefer t
Since a recent update (I have first noticed a couple of weeks ago this
new systemd enhancement), systemd started to automatically clean /tmp
directory daily. This is not something that I like as I prefer to decide
when to clean up and to manually perform the clean up.
I have tried
systemctl stop
25 matches
Mail list logo
