Re: [arch-general] Gufw broken by large update.

2017-01-07 Thread Francis Gerund via arch-general
I did: sudo cp /usr/bin/gufw-pkexec /usr/bin/gufw-pkexec.old Then sudo nano /usr/bin/gufw-pkexec and edited it from: . . . "/usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/gufw/gufw.py" "/usr/lib/python3.5/dist-packages/gufw/gufw.py" . . . to: . . . "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/gufw/gufw.py" "/usr/lib/p

Re: [arch-general] Gufw broken by large update.

2017-01-07 Thread Phil Wyett via arch-general
On Sat, 2017-01-07 at 12:03 +0100, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > On 01/07/17 at 02:36am, Phil Wyett via arch-general wrote: > > Workaround... > > > > In terminal: > > > > sudo python /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/gufw/gufw.py > > This generates a new pyc file, so beware of conflicts when updatin

Re: [arch-general] Gufw broken by large update.

2017-01-07 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On 01/07/17 at 02:36am, Phil Wyett via arch-general wrote: > Workaround... > > In terminal: > > sudo python /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/gufw/gufw.py This generates a new pyc file, so beware of conflicts when updating to a new gufw package. You will have to use the --force :) -- Jelle van

Re: [arch-general] Gufw broken by large update.

2017-01-06 Thread Alonzo Gomez via arch-general
Yes, works from both terminal and just by clicking the icon. Password needed either way, of course. And that should be a quick rebuild. Thanks, Phil!

Re: [arch-general] Gufw broken by large update.

2017-01-06 Thread Phil Wyett via arch-general
On Fri, 2017-01-06 at 21:42 -0500, Alonzo Gomez via arch-general wrote: > Wow, that seems to work here. > Would that still work as an edit to /usr/bin/gufw-pkexec? > Yes it would, but I would hope a rebuild could be performed fairly quickly. Regards Phil -- Play the game, for the games sake

Re: [arch-general] Gufw broken by large update.

2017-01-06 Thread Alonzo Gomez via arch-general
Wow, that seems to work here. Would that still work as an edit to /usr/bin/gufw-pkexec? On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 9:36 PM, Phil Wyett via arch-general wrote: > On Sat, 2017-01-07 at 02:31 +, Phil Wyett wrote: >> On Fri, 2017-01-06 at 21:02 -0500, Alonzo Gomez via arch-general >> wrote: >> > Hi.

Re: [arch-general] Gufw broken by large update.

2017-01-06 Thread Phil Wyett via arch-general
On Sat, 2017-01-07 at 02:31 +, Phil Wyett wrote: > On Fri, 2017-01-06 at 21:02 -0500, Alonzo Gomez via arch-general > wrote: > > Hi. > > > > Gufw was working (xorg only, not under Wayland) until > > today.  Today, > > I > > did a large update of multiple packages - about 240 Mb > > worth.  Aft

Re: [arch-general] Gufw broken by large update.

2017-01-06 Thread Phil Wyett via arch-general
On Fri, 2017-01-06 at 21:02 -0500, Alonzo Gomez via arch-general wrote: > Hi. > > Gufw was working (xorg only, not under Wayland) until today.  Today, > I > did a large update of multiple packages - about 240 Mb worth.  After > that Gufw no longer starts. > > Symptoms: > When gufw icon is clicked

Re: [arch-general] Gufw broken by large update.

2017-01-06 Thread mike lojkovic via arch-general
It's not working for me either. Is gufw written in python? I know python was updated to 3.6 today, breaking a few packages till they get updated for 3.6. On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 8:02 PM, Alonzo Gomez via arch-general < arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > Hi. > > Gufw was working (xorg only, not u

[arch-general] Gufw broken by large update.

2017-01-06 Thread Alonzo Gomez via arch-general
Hi. Gufw was working (xorg only, not under Wayland) until today. Today, I did a large update of multiple packages - about 240 Mb worth. After that Gufw no longer starts. Symptoms: When gufw icon is clicked, the authentication window pops up as usual, requesting the user password. When entered