Il 03/07/2017 04:14, Eli Schwartz via arch-general ha scritto:
>
> So I was under the impression that git tags encode the tagname in the
> actual blob, and I didn't see how that attack (rooted in the basic
> nature of a branch as a lightweight, mutable, *pushable* pointer to a
> commit) was suppos
On 07/02/2017 07:34 PM, Ismael Bouya wrote:
> (Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 07:22:23PM -0400) Eli Schwartz via arch-general :
>> Okay, this I am genuinely curious about.
>>
>> In what circumstances can I have:
>> - the systemd repository cloned over the git:// protocol
>> - an annotated tag for systemd v23
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 02:00:36PM +0100, Christian Hesse wrote:
> Magnus Therning on Wed, 2015/03/25 13:47:
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:47:30PM +0100, Christian Hesse wrote:
> > > Magnus Therning on Wed, 2015/03/25 12:36:
> > > > I thought I'd ask here before raising a ticket.
> > > >
> > >
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 02:00:36PM +0100, Christian Hesse wrote:
> Magnus Therning on Wed, 2015/03/25 13:47:
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:47:30PM +0100, Christian Hesse wrote:
> > > Magnus Therning on Wed, 2015/03/25 12:36:
> > > > I thought I'd ask here before raising a ticket.
> > > >
> > >
Magnus Therning on Wed, 2015/03/25 13:47:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:47:30PM +0100, Christian Hesse wrote:
> > Magnus Therning on Wed, 2015/03/25 12:36:
> > > I thought I'd ask here before raising a ticket.
> > >
> > > Is anyone else seeing this behaviour with git 2.3.4-1:
> > >
> > > ~~~
> >
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:47:30PM +0100, Christian Hesse wrote:
> Magnus Therning on Wed, 2015/03/25 12:36:
> > I thought I'd ask here before raising a ticket.
> >
> > Is anyone else seeing this behaviour with git 2.3.4-1:
> >
> > ~~~
> > [I] % git fetch
> > ssh: Could not resolve hostname buil
Magnus Therning on Wed, 2015/03/25 12:36:
> I thought I'd ask here before raising a ticket.
>
> Is anyone else seeing this behaviour with git 2.3.4-1:
>
> ~~~
> [I] % git fetch
> ssh: Could not resolve hostname build01:: Name or service not known
> fatal: Could not read from remote repository.
>
I thought I'd ask here before raising a ticket.
Is anyone else seeing this behaviour with git 2.3.4-1:
~~~
[I] % git fetch
ssh: Could not resolve hostname build01:: Name or service not known
fatal: Could not read from remote repository.
Please make sure you have the correct access rights
and the
On 2014-06-16 00:50, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
Hi all,
For several resaons, I use a few *-git packages from AUR.
I noticed one thing: the last update date is often far behind (i.e.
2012,...)
I just would like to ensure it's just the package last update date,
and it has no realtion with t
Hi all,
For several resaons, I use a few *-git packages from AUR.
I noticed one thing: the last update date is often far behind (i.e.
2012,...)
I just would like to ensure it's just the package last update date, and
it has no realtion with the git tree freshness: git always checks out
"maste
Hi
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Daniel Wallace
wrote:
>
>
>> From: pdgid...@gmail.com
>> To: arch-general@archlinux.org
>> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:32:26 +0100
>> Subject: Re: [arch-general] Git
>>
>> On Monday 30 Sep 2013 05:13:57 Sebastian Schwar
> From: pdgid...@gmail.com
> To: arch-general@archlinux.org
> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:32:26 +0100
> Subject: Re: [arch-general] Git
>
> On Monday 30 Sep 2013 05:13:57 Sebastian Schwarz wrote:
> > On 2013-29-09, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> > > If we were t
On Monday 30 Sep 2013 05:13:57 Sebastian Schwarz wrote:
> On 2013-29-09, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> > If we were to use git, we should have one git repository per
> > package, and also provide one repository which includes all
> > the packages as submodules.
>
> Why not use one branch per package and
On 2013-29-09, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> If we were to use git, we should have one git repository per
> package, and also provide one repository which includes all
> the packages as submodules.
Why not use one branch per package and one branch per repository
with the packages as submodules instead o
On 09/04/2012 09:14 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 05/09/12 00:03, David C. Rankin wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> pacman -Syu this morning and groupadd failed while installing git with the
>> following message:
>>
>> ( 28/115) upgrading git
>> [###] 100%
>> groupadd: Invalid configurat
On 05/09/12 00:03, David C. Rankin wrote:
> All,
>
> pacman -Syu this morning and groupadd failed while installing git with the
> following message:
>
> ( 28/115) upgrading git
> [###] 100%
> groupadd: Invalid configuration: SYS_GID_MIN (101), GID_MIN (100),
> SYS_GID_M
All,
pacman -Syu this morning and groupadd failed while installing git with the
following message:
( 28/115) upgrading git
[###] 100%
groupadd: Invalid configuration: SYS_GID_MIN (101), GID_MIN (100), SYS_GID_MAX
(99)
useradd: group 'git' does not exist
error: command f
2012/3/12 Cédric Girard :
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 1:17 PM, F. Gr. wrote:
>
>> Now I want to remove some files from history and
>> the objects in my repository. Are these the right commands?
>>
>> git filter-branch -d /dir1/subdir/ --index-filter 'git rm --cached -f
>> --ignore-unmatch' -- --all
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 1:17 PM, F. Gr. wrote:
> Now I want to remove some files from history and
> the objects in my repository. Are these the right commands?
>
> git filter-branch -d /dir1/subdir/ --index-filter 'git rm --cached -f
> --ignore-unmatch' -- --all
> rm -rf /git_repo/.git/refs/remot
On Monday 12 Mar 2012 13:17:11 F. Gr. wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm a new user of git software. I imported a mercurial repository to
> a git repository. Now I want to remove some files from history and
> the objects in my repository. Are these the right commands?
>
> git filter-branch -d /dir1/subdir/ --inde
Hi,
I'm a new user of git software. I imported a mercurial repository to
a git repository. Now I want to remove some files from history and
the objects in my repository. Are these the right commands?
git filter-branch -d /dir1/subdir/ --index-filter 'git rm --cached -f
--ignore-unmatch' -- --all
Hi,
I'm not an expert and my suggested solutions are pretty dirty, but I have
encountered this issue as well, so here are my 2 cents...
Each module stores a version string in it, which prevents it from being
loaded if it doesn't match to the one of the currently running kernel. This
string is aut
I'm trying to bisect an issue with the microphone not working on my usb webcam.
See the forum posting [1]. I cloned the Linus' git tree and checked out v2.6.39.
I zcat /proc/config.gz > .config and did a make modules. I did this to get the
symbol table and all that set up correctly.
After that
23 matches
Mail list logo
