+ronald
Hi
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Lukas Jirkovsky wrote:
>> Actually I have more general question. There are many out-of-date
>> packages that are not updated for a long time. Should other
>> (non-package owners) take care of it?
>
> I can't tell why fuse is not updated, but often the
> Actually I have more general question. There are many out-of-date
> packages that are not updated for a long time. Should other
> (non-package owners) take care of it?
I can't tell why fuse is not updated, but often there is a reason for
package being outdated for a longer period of time. For ex
Hi,
fuse 2.9.2 was released a while ago. This release contains important
bug-fix for deadlock and there are arch users that wait for this
version https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=146157
Some time ago I marked the package as out-of-date
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/fuse/
3 matches
Mail list logo