Re: [arch-general] Fuse and out-of-date packages in general

2012-11-11 Thread Anatol Pomozov
+ronald Hi On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Lukas Jirkovsky wrote: >> Actually I have more general question. There are many out-of-date >> packages that are not updated for a long time. Should other >> (non-package owners) take care of it? > > I can't tell why fuse is not updated, but often the

Re: [arch-general] Fuse and out-of-date packages in general

2012-11-10 Thread Lukas Jirkovsky
> Actually I have more general question. There are many out-of-date > packages that are not updated for a long time. Should other > (non-package owners) take care of it? I can't tell why fuse is not updated, but often there is a reason for package being outdated for a longer period of time. For ex

[arch-general] Fuse and out-of-date packages in general

2012-11-10 Thread Anatol Pomozov
Hi, fuse 2.9.2 was released a while ago. This release contains important bug-fix for deadlock and there are arch users that wait for this version https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=146157 Some time ago I marked the package as out-of-date https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/fuse/