On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:59:20AM +0100, Ondřej Kučera wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 7.3.2011 18:45, Andreas Radke wrote:
> >LibreOffice has recently proved to be a solid replacement for Oracle
> >OpenOffice. I'm about to drop all Oracle OOo packages from our repos.
>
> I have a small concern. I regula
Hello,
On 7.3.2011 18:45, Andreas Radke wrote:
LibreOffice has recently proved to be a solid replacement for Oracle
OpenOffice. I'm about to drop all Oracle OOo packages from our repos.
I have a small concern. I regularly need to do a batch conversion of ODS
files to CSV. For a long time I've
On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 01:33 +0100, Linas wrote:
> Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > Dedicated to the relatively-closed and more-constrained version of whats
> > in the repos. Sure =)
> >
> > The distros have jumped fast, but I'm wondering about the Windows users
> > of openoffice, seems to me none of them would
Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> Dedicated to the relatively-closed and more-constrained version of whats
> in the repos. Sure =)
>
> The distros have jumped fast, but I'm wondering about the Windows users
> of openoffice, seems to me none of them would try libreoffice just
> because its there (and frankly the p
On Mar 10, 2011 10:04am, Vitor Eiji Justus Sakaguti
wrote:
I switched to LibreOffice as soon as it hit the repos and I don't miss a
thing.
Also, I don't think we should worry too much about users coming from
Windows. Really, if they're here, they're not afraid of change.
Drop it now!
I switched to LibreOffice as soon as it hit the repos and I don't miss a thing.
Also, I don't think we should worry too much about users coming from
Windows. Really, if they're here, they're not afraid of change.
Drop it now!
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 02:01:25 -0500 (EST) Jude DaShiell wrote:
> libri-openoffice-supported and all oracle-openoffice packages
> oracle-openoffice-unsupported. Debian at any rate has a playground
> area
Before doing this i suggest to name it:
needless_sh**_for_non_latex_users_bought_from_the_dar
Am Wed, 9 Mar 2011 03:29:18 -0500 (EST)
schrieb Jude DaShiell :
> So as long as the libriopenoffice is in (o) other packages having a
> need for some flavor of openoffice depending on arch-linux
> dependencies policy would take the official packages first. If
> that's the case such naming convent
So as long as the libriopenoffice is in (o) other packages having a need
for some flavor of openoffice depending on arch-linux dependencies policy
would take the official packages first. If that's the case such naming
conventions would be unnecessary.On Wed, 9 Mar 2011, ??? wrote:
> 2011/3/9 J
2011/3/9 Thomas Dziedzic :
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Jude DaShiell wrote:
>> For such a transition, I think it will be helpful for everybody using
>> arch-linux to name aall libri-openoffice packages
>> libri-openoffice-supported and all oracle-openoffice packages
>> oracle-openoffice-unsu
2011/3/9 Jude DaShiell :
> For such a transition, I think it will be helpful for everybody using
> arch-linux to name aall libri-openoffice packages
> libri-openoffice-supported and all oracle-openoffice packages
> oracle-openoffice-unsupported. Debian at any rate has a playground area
> where uns
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> For such a transition, I think it will be helpful for everybody using
> arch-linux to name aall libri-openoffice packages
> libri-openoffice-supported and all oracle-openoffice packages
> oracle-openoffice-unsupported. Debian at any rate has
For such a transition, I think it will be helpful for everybody using
arch-linux to name aall libri-openoffice packages
libri-openoffice-supported and all oracle-openoffice packages
oracle-openoffice-unsupported. Debian at any rate has a playground area
where unsupported packages go within its
On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 10:22 -0600, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
> 2011/3/7 Ng Oon-Ee :
> > On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 22:00 -0600, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
> >> just an fyi,
> >> openoffice itself is *huge* and now that it is going to be dropped to
> >> the aur, it will most likely lose all audience because of
2011/3/7 Ng Oon-Ee :
> On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 22:00 -0600, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
>> just an fyi,
>> openoffice itself is *huge* and now that it is going to be dropped to
>> the aur, it will most likely lose all audience because of how long it
>> takes to compile from source. + libreoffice is just a
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 22:00 -0600, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
> just an fyi,
> openoffice itself is *huge* and now that it is going to be dropped to
> the aur, it will most likely lose all audience because of how long it
> takes to compile from source. + libreoffice is just a better version
> of openof
+1 I see common sense in arch!! :)
On 8 March 2011 07:04, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> You should know replacing Oracle OpenOffice also does the accessibility
> crowd that uses orca a huge favor too. The Libri OpenOffice packages work
> better with Orca in several versions and don't crash because orca
You should know replacing Oracle OpenOffice also does the accessibility
crowd that uses orca a huge favor too. The Libri OpenOffice packages work
better with Orca in several versions and don't crash because orca is
running on the systems.On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
> On 07.03
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Andreas Radke wrote:
> LibreOffice has recently proved to be a solid replacement for Oracle
> OpenOffice. I'm about to drop all Oracle OOo packages from our repos.
>
> First my time is limited. I've asked so many times for help in the
> Office packaging area and nob
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
>> On 07.03.2011 18:45, Andreas Radke wrote:
>>> LibreOffice has recently proved to be a solid replacement for Oracle
>>> OpenOffice. I'm about to drop all Oracle OOo packages fro
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
> On 07.03.2011 18:45, Andreas Radke wrote:
>> LibreOffice has recently proved to be a solid replacement for Oracle
>> OpenOffice. I'm about to drop all Oracle OOo packages from our repos.
>>
>> First my time is limited. I've asked so many
On 07.03.2011 18:45, Andreas Radke wrote:
> LibreOffice has recently proved to be a solid replacement for Oracle
> OpenOffice. I'm about to drop all Oracle OOo packages from our repos.
>
> First my time is limited. I've asked so many times for help in the
> Office packaging area and nobody stepped
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Squall Lionheart
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Andreas Radke wrote:
>
>> LibreOffice has recently proved to be a solid replacement for Oracle
>> OpenOffice. I'm about to drop all Oracle OOo packages from our repos.
>>
>> First my time is limited. I've
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Andreas Radke wrote:
> LibreOffice has recently proved to be a solid replacement for Oracle
> OpenOffice. I'm about to drop all Oracle OOo packages from our repos.
>
> First my time is limited. I've asked so many times for help in the
> Office packaging area and n
LibreOffice has recently proved to be a solid replacement for Oracle
OpenOffice. I'm about to drop all Oracle OOo packages from our repos.
First my time is limited. I've asked so many times for help in the
Office packaging area and nobody stepped in.
Then there's the poor distribution support Ora
25 matches
Mail list logo
