Re: [arch-general] Defunct processes left behind for screen and firefox

2009-10-11 Thread Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
Hate to bother you all again, but it seems that not only screen and firefox are hit by the 'defunct' processes left behind... Now also runsv (part of runit) sometimes behaves like this. Am I the only one that experiences defunct processes left behind? Thanks, Ciprian. On Tu

Re: [arch-general] Defunct processes left behind for screen and firefox

2009-10-06 Thread Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Loui Chang wrote: > On Tue 06 Oct 2009 18:40 +0300, Ciprian Dorin, Craciun wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 6:33 PM, David Houston wrote: >> > I Wonder weather it is your screen augments. Try using just -r rather than >> > -RR >> > >> > Dave >> > - >>

Re: [arch-general] Defunct processes left behind for screen and firefox

2009-10-06 Thread Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
I'm using urxvt with the options `urxvt -title x-console -e ~/.bin/x-console -- screen -RR` where ~/.bin/x-console doesn't do anything except exporting LC_ALL=en_US.utf8 and `locale`. (I've also tried just a simple urxvt -e screen -RR, and it also leaves processes behind.) And indeed if I

Re: [arch-general] Defunct processes left behind for screen and firefox

2009-10-06 Thread Loui Chang
On Tue 06 Oct 2009 18:40 +0300, Ciprian Dorin, Craciun wrote: > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 6:33 PM, David Houston wrote: > > I Wonder weather it is your screen augments. Try using just -r rather than > > -RR > > > > Dave > > - > > r...@crankyadmin.net > > cra...@archlinux.us > > > > > > >

Re: [arch-general] Defunct processes left behind for screen and firefox

2009-10-06 Thread David Houston
What terminal emulator are you using? Also what happens if you start a screen session in VT and detach and reattach once in X. It sounds like a variable is wonky somewhere... Dave - r...@crankyadmin.net cra...@archlinux.us On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Ciprian Dorin, Craciun wr

Re: [arch-general] Defunct processes left behind for screen and firefox

2009-10-06 Thread Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 6:33 PM, David Houston wrote: > I Wonder weather it is your screen augments. Try using just -r rather than -RR > > Dave > - > r...@crankyadmin.net > cra...@archlinux.us > > > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Ciprian Dorin, Craciun > wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 6, 200

Re: [arch-general] Defunct processes left behind for screen and firefox

2009-10-06 Thread David Houston
I Wonder weather it is your screen augments. Try using just -r rather than -RR Dave - r...@crankyadmin.net cra...@archlinux.us On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Ciprian Dorin, Craciun wrote: > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Ci

Re: [arch-general] Defunct processes left behind for screen and firefox

2009-10-06 Thread Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Ciprian Dorin, Craciun > wrote: >>    Hello all! >> >>    I'm having the following issue: after opening and closing some >> shells within the same screen session, I'm left with a bunch of >> defunct bash proces

Re: [arch-general] Defunct processes left behind for screen and firefox

2009-10-06 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Ciprian Dorin, Craciun wrote: >    Hello all! > >    I'm having the following issue: after opening and closing some > shells within the same screen session, I'm left with a bunch of > defunct bash processes, that screen doesn't seem to wait for... Is > there any iss

[arch-general] Defunct processes left behind for screen and firefox

2009-10-06 Thread Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
Hello all! I'm having the following issue: after opening and closing some shells within the same screen session, I'm left with a bunch of defunct bash processes, that screen doesn't seem to wait for... Is there any issue with screen? Or is there any issue in general, as Firefox plugin