On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 03:41:06PM -0500, Baho Utot wrote:
> On Friday 02 January 2009 01:20:32 pm Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 08:59:18AM -0500, Baho Utot wrote:
> > > Should a goal of ArchLinux be that the core and extra repos build without
> > > error.
> > >
> > > I am r
On Friday 02 January 2009 01:20:32 pm Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 08:59:18AM -0500, Baho Utot wrote:
> > Should a goal of ArchLinux be that the core and extra repos build without
> > error.
> >
> > I am rebuilding all the packages from core and some selected packages
> > fro
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 08:59:18AM -0500, Baho Utot wrote:
> Should a goal of ArchLinux be that the core and extra repos build without
> error.
>
> I am rebuilding all the packages from core and some selected packages from
> extra to take advantage of my processor an AMD Athlon processors, which
On Friday 02 January 2009 09:23:41 am Robert Howard wrote:
> Is it possible that your optimizations are responsible for the breakage?
No when using the standard optimizations the same thing happens.
Here are my optimizations:
CFLAGS="-march=native -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer"
CX
Is it possible that your optimizations are responsible for the breakage?
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Baho Utot wrote:
> Should a goal of ArchLinux be that the core and extra repos build without
> error.
>
> I am rebuilding all the packages from core and some selected packages from
> extra t
Should a goal of ArchLinux be that the core and extra repos build without
error.
I am rebuilding all the packages from core and some selected packages from
extra to take advantage of my processor an AMD Athlon processors, which I use
exclusive.
I have used makeworld from a make file and ther
6 matches
Mail list logo