On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 4:05 AM, Madhurya Kakati wrote:
> On Feb 15, 2012 11:35 PM, "jwbirdsong" <
> jwbirds...@jwbirdsong.homelinux.com>
> wrote:
> > > Dude, what are these extra repos for? Can you tell me how to include
> them in my
> > > pacman.conf?
> > > Thanks.
> > One REALLY has to wonder a
On Feb 15, 2012 11:35 PM, "jwbirdsong"
wrote:
> > Dude, what are these extra repos for? Can you tell me how to include
them in my
> > pacman.conf?
> > Thanks.
> One REALLY has to wonder about the wisdom of a statment like that.. What
> are those repos for... i want them.. REALLY?? why would you w
On 02/15/2012 01:04 PM, jwbirdsong wrote:
On 02/15/2012 10:18 AM, Madhurya Kakati wrote:
On 02/14/12 at 11:49pm, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
The pacman upgrade didn't cause trouble here. When I run pacman -Syu the
first time, only pacman was shown. Directly after installing it I run
pacman -Syu again a
On 02/15/2012 10:18 AM, Madhurya Kakati wrote:
> On 02/14/12 at 11:49pm, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> The pacman upgrade didn't cause trouble here. When I run pacman -Syu the
>> first time, only pacman was shown. Directly after installing it I run
>> pacman -Syu again and there where 5 targets.
>>
>> # n
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:48:57PM +0530, Madhurya Kakati wrote:
> On 02/14/12 at 11:49pm, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > The pacman upgrade didn't cause trouble here. When I run pacman -Syu the
> > first time, only pacman was shown. Directly after installing it I run
> > pacman -Syu again and there where
On 02/14/12 at 11:49pm, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> The pacman upgrade didn't cause trouble here. When I run pacman -Syu the
> first time, only pacman was shown. Directly after installing it I run
> pacman -Syu again and there where 5 targets.
>
> # ntpdate ntp.favey.ch
> 14 Feb 23:34:30
> # pacman -Syu
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 23:49 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> The pacman upgrade didn't cause trouble here. When I run pacman -Syu the
> first time, only pacman was shown. Directly after installing it I run
> pacman -Syu again and there where 5 targets.
>
> # ntpdate ntp.favey.ch
> 14 Feb 23:34:30
> #
The pacman upgrade didn't cause trouble here. When I run pacman -Syu the
first time, only pacman was shown. Directly after installing it I run
pacman -Syu again and there where 5 targets.
# ntpdate ntp.favey.ch
14 Feb 23:34:30
# pacman -Syu
:: Synchronizing package databases...
core
extra
commu
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:19:28 +0530
Madhurya Kakati wrote:
> Greetings,
> The command pacman -Su fails(I ran -Sy separately before this). I last
> updated the system day before yesterday.
>
> $ sudo pacman -Su
> :: The following packages should be upgraded first :
> pacman
> :: Do you want to ca
On 14 February 2012 19:49, Madhurya Kakati wrote:
> Greetings,
> The command pacman -Su fails(I ran -Sy separately before this). I last
> updated the system day before yesterday.
>
> $ sudo pacman -Su
> :: The following packages should be upgraded first :
> pacman
> :: Do you want to cancel the c
Hi,
A workaround is to force-remove gcc-multilib before updating:
pacman -Rdd gcc-multilib
But make sure to reinstall gcc-multilib again afterwards.
-Jakob
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 23:19, Madhurya Kakati wrote:
> Greetings,
> The command pacman -Su fails(I ran -Sy separately before this). I last
> updated the system day before yesterday.
>
> $ sudo pacman -Su
> :: The following packages should be upgraded first :
> pacman
> :: Do you want to cancel t
Greetings,
The command pacman -Su fails(I ran -Sy separately before this). I last updated
the system day before yesterday.
$ sudo pacman -Su
:: The following packages should be upgraded first :
pacman
:: Do you want to cancel the current operation
:: and upgrade these packages now? [Y/n]
resolvi
[root@elite331 barthalion]# LANG=C pacman -Su
:: Starting full system upgrade...
resolving dependencies...
warning: cannot resolve "grub2-common=1.99", a dependency of "grub2-bios"
:: The following package cannot be upgraded due to unresolvable dependencies:
grub2-bios
Do you want to skip th
On 06/12/2011 07:37 PM, Frederic Bezies wrote:
Hello.
Facing a strange problem.
I'm using this grub2 version :
[fred@fredo-arch ~]$ pacman -Qi grub2-{common,bios} | grep Version
Version : 1.99~rc2.r3238-1
Version : 1.99~rc2.r3238-1
And when I want to upgrade it to
Hello.
Facing a strange problem.
I'm using this grub2 version :
[fred@fredo-arch ~]$ pacman -Qi grub2-{common,bios} | grep Version
Version : 1.99~rc2.r3238-1
Version : 1.99~rc2.r3238-1
And when I want to upgrade it to 1.99-2 (last version in testing), I got
this :
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Xavier wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Panos Filip wrote:
> >
> > I found it 5 secs after I has sent this e-mail ;-)
> >
> > It seems to be a problem for both i686 and x86_64.
> >
>
> well system-config-printer is now a 'any' package , so that makes sense
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Panos Filip wrote:
>
> I found it 5 secs after I has sent this e-mail ;-)
>
> It seems to be a problem for both i686 and x86_64.
>
well system-config-printer is now a 'any' package , so that makes sense.
and the problem should be fixed with 1.1.12-5
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Xavier wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Panos Filip wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 8:21 AM, wrote:
> >
> >> > 2) Because of kdeadmin-system-config-printer-kde and
> >> > kdeutils-printer-applet, system-config-printer-common cannot be
> >> installed.
>
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Panos Filip wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 8:21 AM, wrote:
>
>> > 2) Because of kdeadmin-system-config-printer-kde and
>> > kdeutils-printer-applet, system-config-printer-common cannot be
>> installed.
>> >
>> > Do I have to open a bug ? Or is it already known ?
>>
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 8:21 AM, wrote:
> > 2) Because of kdeadmin-system-config-printer-kde and
> > kdeutils-printer-applet, system-config-printer-common cannot be
> installed.
> >
> > Do I have to open a bug ? Or is it already known ?
> >
> I have the same problem using a 100% standard arch64 se
> 2) Because of kdeadmin-system-config-printer-kde and
> kdeutils-printer-applet, system-config-printer-common cannot be installed.
>
> Do I have to open a bug ? Or is it already known ?
>
I have the same problem using a 100% standard arch64 setup.
Hello.
This morning (Paris Time), I wanted to upgrade my archlinux. So, I launched
a little sudo pacman -Syu and here is what is happening :
fred ~ $ sudo pacman -Syu
Mot de passe :
:: Synchronisation des bases de données de paquets...
testing est à jour;
core est à jour;
extra est à jour;
co
23 matches
Mail list logo
