Re: [arch-general] Apache 2.4 revisited

2013-07-11 Thread Armin K.
On 07/11/2013 04:44 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 11.07.2013 15:45, schrieb Armin K.: >>> As a side note, apache24 uses event_mpm by default, but you might need >>> to change to prefork one to use PHP module. Also, with apache 2.4 you >>> can use php-fpm via mod_proxy as described at [3] >>> >>> A

Re: [arch-general] Apache 2.4 revisited

2013-07-11 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 11.07.2013 15:45, schrieb Armin K.: >> As a side note, apache24 uses event_mpm by default, but you might need >> to change to prefork one to use PHP module. Also, with apache 2.4 you >> can use php-fpm via mod_proxy as described at [3] >> >> As for the perl module, I had to use svn checkout of t

Re: [arch-general] Apache 2.4 revisited

2013-07-11 Thread Armin K.
On 07/07/2013 12:35 AM, Armin K. wrote: > Hello, > > I've wondered why no one upgraded Apache to 2.4 after being available > for so long. Then I stumbled upon an answer on this list where it has > been said that 2.4 breaks too many packages [1]. > > I've taken some time to verify what does it bre

Re: [arch-general] Apache 2.4 revisited

2013-07-06 Thread Daniel Micay
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Armin K. wrote: > Hello, > > I've wondered why no one upgraded Apache to 2.4 after being available > for so long. Then I stumbled upon an answer on this list where it has > been said that 2.4 breaks too many packages [1]. > > I've taken some time to verify what does

[arch-general] Apache 2.4 revisited

2013-07-06 Thread Armin K.
Hello, I've wondered why no one upgraded Apache to 2.4 after being available for so long. Then I stumbled upon an answer on this list where it has been said that 2.4 breaks too many packages [1]. I've taken some time to verify what does it break, and fixed all packages from [extra] and [community