Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit - tone it down

2010-02-02 Thread Joerg Schilling
Gaurish Sharma wrote: > Hi, > On the Wiki, Add a small note about cdrtools. proposing it as > alternate over cdkit.so let the user decide: > http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/CD_Burning_Tips Just a note: cdrecord has a more complete CDRWIN CUE support than cdrdao. Jörg -- EMail:jo...@schil

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit - tone it down

2010-02-01 Thread Armando M. Baratti
On 01-02-2010 06:17, Joerg Schilling wrote: "Armando M. Baratti" wrote: Strange, I have had the opposite experience. Trying to burn some CDs with cdrkit (on CentOS) give some problem with not being able to generate Joliet system and I have had trouble with utf-8 too. First I thought I was mak

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit - tone it down

2010-02-01 Thread Joerg Schilling
"Armando M. Baratti" wrote: > Strange, I have had the opposite experience. > Trying to burn some CDs with cdrkit (on CentOS) give some problem with > not being able to generate Joliet system and I have had trouble with > utf-8 too. > > First I thought I was making some stupid mistake, but chang

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit - tone it down

2010-01-31 Thread Armando M. Baratti
On 30-01-2010 12:58, Baho Utot wrote: I don't think you "get it". First of all, I don't care what happened when the split or fork happened. It makes _ZERO_ difference to me. This is what I have done because of _your_ direct actions on this list and other actions by you on some news groups I rea

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit - tone it down

2010-01-31 Thread Joerg Schilling
Gaurish Sharma wrote: > Hi, > On the Wiki, Add a small note about cdrtools. proposing it as > alternate over cdkit.so let the user decide: > http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/CD_Burning_Tips This is of course better than doing nothing. Please note however that this discussion did not start bec

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit - tone it down

2010-01-31 Thread Joerg Schilling
Baho Utot wrote: > Joerg Schilling wrote: > > Baho Utot wrote: > > > > > >> I have preformed some tests and guess what cdrkit works! Imagine that. > >> It burnt the iso's for Slackware distribution, and using md5sum to sum > >> both a Slackware distribution disk burned by both cdrkit and cd

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit - tone it down

2010-01-31 Thread Gaurish Sharma
Hi, On the Wiki, Add a small note about cdrtools. proposing it as alternate over cdkit.so let the user decide: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/CD_Burning_Tips Regards, Gaurish Sharma www.gaurishsharma.com

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit - tone it down

2010-01-31 Thread Baho Utot
Joerg Schilling wrote: Baho Utot wrote: I have preformed some tests and guess what cdrkit works! Imagine that. It burnt the iso's for Slackware distribution, and using md5sum to sum both a Slackware distribution disk burned by both cdrkit and cdrtools and they are the same, how did that

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit - tone it down

2010-01-31 Thread Joerg Schilling
Baho Utot wrote: > I have preformed some tests and guess what cdrkit works! Imagine that. > It burnt the iso's for Slackware distribution, and using md5sum to sum > both a Slackware distribution disk burned by both cdrkit and cdrtools > and they are the same, how did that happen? There is a 9

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit - tone it down

2010-01-30 Thread fons
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 09:58:19AM -0500, Baho Utot wrote: > This is what I have done because of _your_ direct actions on this > list and other actions by you on some news groups I read. > ... Your post makes you look like a juvenile struggling with the first hormones. > I don't care if cdrtool

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit - tone it down

2010-01-30 Thread Baho Utot
Joerg Schilling wrote: Heiko Baums wrote: I mean I assume that you have a big technical knowledge. Otherwise you wouldn't be able to write such a program and build such an Open Solaris LiveCD. But I also can understand that some people feel being attacked by you. On the other hand I can und

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit - tone it down

2010-01-30 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:56:13 +0100 schrieb joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Joerg Schilling): > It seems that you also use this discussion to attack me. Where did I attack you? If you feel so easy being attacked, then you should indeed think about yourself. Greetings, Heiko

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit - tone it down

2010-01-30 Thread Allan McRae
On 30/01/10 23:56, Joerg Schilling wrote: It would help a lot of you first try to understand what happened. A person did make a claim about an alleged problem without giving any proof for his claims. I asked him kindly to give enough information so in case there really was a problem, I am able to

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit - tone it down

2010-01-30 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 14:56 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote: > Heiko Baums wrote: > > > I mean I assume that you have a big technical knowledge. Otherwise you > > wouldn't be able to write such a program and build such an Open Solaris > > LiveCD. But I also can understand that some people feel being

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit - tone it down

2010-01-30 Thread Joerg Schilling
Heiko Baums wrote: > I mean I assume that you have a big technical knowledge. Otherwise you > wouldn't be able to write such a program and build such an Open Solaris > LiveCD. But I also can understand that some people feel being attacked > by you. On the other hand I can understand that you like

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit - tone it down

2010-01-30 Thread Joerg Schilling
Daenyth Blank wrote: > I have been reading this mailing list for several years, and can think > of maybe one or two discussions that got like this. The vast majority > of them are quite civil technical discussions. Don't blame the > language for your lack of competence. If you feel that English c

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit - tone it down

2010-01-30 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Sat, 30 Jan 2010 12:48:33 +0100 schrieb joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Joerg Schilling): > Let me give some basic explanations: > > In German we have the word "Streitkultur", there is no equlvalent in > English - guess why... And the word "Streitkultur" is the biggest misnomer ("Unwort"

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit - tone it down

2010-01-30 Thread Daenyth Blank
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 06:48, Joerg Schilling wrote: > In Germany, it is possible to have a technically based discussion without > attacking the other people. If you try to have the same using the English > language, people often claim that they have been personally attacked and > personally atta

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit - tone it down

2010-01-30 Thread Joerg Schilling
Nathan Wayde wrote: > @Joerg Schilling > > This is not another attack against you so please to not try and make > yourself appear as some kinda of victim here as well. Let me give some basic explanations: In German we have the word "Streitkultur", there is no equlvalent in English - guess why

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit - tone it down

2010-01-30 Thread Nathan Wayde
@Joerg Schilling This is not another attack against you so please to not try and make yourself appear as some kinda of victim here as well. I know it's none of my business replying here, but I feel I need to say something. It's not related to the original discussion, but your attitude. Now,