On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 01:21:28AM +0100, mpan wrote:
>
> >>> It states MIT/BSD are special cases, just out of curiousity, what makes
> >>> them special that they cannot be added?
> >> Because there is no MIT or 1/2/3-clause BSD license. There are
> >> hundreds of independent, barely related
>>> It states MIT/BSD are special cases, just out of curiousity, what makes
>>> them special that they cannot be added?
>> Because there is no MIT or 1/2/3-clause BSD license. There are
>> hundreds of independent, barely related licenses that are quite similar
>> and, therefore, are considere
On Sun, 4 Nov 2018 00:24:14 +0100
mpan wrote:
> > It states MIT/BSD are special cases, just out of curiousity, what makes
> > them special that they cannot be added?
> Because there is no MIT or 1/2/3-clause BSD license. There are
> hundreds of independent, barely related licenses that are q
> It states MIT/BSD are special cases, just out of curiousity, what makes them
> special that they cannot be added?
Because there is no MIT or 1/2/3-clause BSD license. There are
hundreds of independent, barely related licenses that are quite similar
and, therefore, are considered together as a
Saturday, November 3, 2018 7:53 PM, John Ramsden via arch-general
dixit:
> It states MIT/BSD are special cases, just out of curiousity, what makes them
> special that they cannot be added?
Look at them: https://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause
https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
For one,
On Sat, Nov 03, 2018 at 11:53:45AM -0700, John Ramsden via arch-general wrote:
> It states MIT/BSD are special cases, just out of curiousity, what makes them
> special that they cannot be added?
>
I believe the reasoning for that is they include program-specific
copyright information, so you can'
It states MIT/BSD are special cases, just out of curiousity, what makes them
special that they cannot be added?
--
John Ramsden
On Sat, Nov 3, 2018, at 1:22 AM, Bruno Pagani via arch-general wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 03/11/2018 à 08:46, Stephen Gregoratto via arch-general a écrit :
> > I'm in the
Hi,
Le 03/11/2018 à 08:46, Stephen Gregoratto via arch-general a écrit :
> I'm in the process of adding a new package to the AUR, when I noticed
> that the MIT Licence - which this program is licensed under - is not
> available under /usr/share/licenses/common. Seeing that it's a fairly
> popul
I'm in the process of adding a new package to the AUR, when I noticed
that the MIT Licence - which this program is licensed under - is not
available under /usr/share/licenses/common. Seeing that it's a fairly
popular license that is copied by a number of packages (many of them
Rust based: find
9 matches
Mail list logo
