> Archboot:
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Archboot
> https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=143541
>
> It uses a working installer for quite everything.
> For complete systemd support next ISO would be better to use,
> I'm only waiting for core changes to calm down first.
> greetings
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Tobias Powalowski
wrote:
> Am Mon, 16 Jul 2012 13:28:00 +0200
> schrieb fredbezies :
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> I've read the wiki page for arch-install-scripts. It is not very
>> "user-friendly". Any hope to see this "embedded" in a program, like
>> good old arch/setup ?
>
Am Mon, 16 Jul 2012 13:28:00 +0200
schrieb fredbezies :
> Hello.
>
> I've read the wiki page for arch-install-scripts. It is not very
> "user-friendly". Any hope to see this "embedded" in a program, like
> good old arch/setup ?
>
> I'm not afraid of these scripts, but it could drive away some us
[2012-07-16 14:13:39 +0200] Christoph Vigano:
> Speaking of which: how can one get involved into the development of AIF?
https://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-releng
> Is there something like a bug list for it?
https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?project=6
> Something different:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
> Personally I think we would be better off with just these scripts
> + lots of documentation. If you are interested in an installer,
> then I guess the best solution is to get involved with the AIF and
> get it into shape again.
Speaking of which:
[2012-07-16 13:28:00 +0200] fredbezies:
> I'm not afraid of these scripts, but it could drive away some users
> which are not ready for a so "simplified" installation tool.
In view of the many issues and complaints related to the move from /lib
to /usr/lib, it seems pretty clear to me that most pe
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 1:28 PM, fredbezies wrote:
> I've read the wiki page for arch-install-scripts. It is not very
> "user-friendly". Any hope to see this "embedded" in a program, like
> good old arch/setup ?
Personally I think we would be better off with just these scripts +
lots of documenta
2012/7/16 fredbezies
> Hello.
>
> I've read the wiki page for arch-install-scripts. It is not very
> "user-friendly". Any hope to see this "embedded" in a program, like
> good old arch/setup ?
>
> I'm not afraid of these scripts, but it could drive away some users
> which are not ready for a so "
fredbezies wrote:
Hello.
I've read the wiki page for arch-install-scripts. It is not very
"user-friendly". Any hope to see this "embedded" in a program, like
good old arch/setup ?
I'm not afraid of these scripts, but it could drive away some users
which are not ready for a so "simplified" insta
Hello.
I've read the wiki page for arch-install-scripts. It is not very
"user-friendly". Any hope to see this "embedded" in a program, like
good old arch/setup ?
I'm not afraid of these scripts, but it could drive away some users
which are not ready for a so "simplified" installation tool.
--
F
10 matches
Mail list logo
