On 2018-01-11 15:48, Bartłomiej Piotrowski via arch-general wrote:
> On 2018-01-09 13:32, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
>> I'd like to keep maintaining oolite if it's not too much work but I'm
>> definitely not going to touch GNUstep stuff. So if no one is going to
>> maintain GNUstep in official repos
I'm not a trusted User, but I would offer maintaining the gnustep packages
in the AUR
Regards
Marc
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 1:00 PM, wrote:
>
> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 23:44:20 +0100
> From: LoneVVolf
> To: arch-general@archlinux.org
> Subject: Re: [arch-general] AL gnustep
On 11-01-18 15:48, Bartłomiej Piotrowski via arch-general wrote:
On 2018-01-09 13:32, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
I'd like to keep maintaining oolite if it's not too much work but I'm
definitely not going to touch GNUstep stuff. So if no one is going to
maintain GNUstep in official repos, we shoul
On 2018-01-09 13:32, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
> I'd like to keep maintaining oolite if it's not too much work but I'm
> definitely not going to touch GNUstep stuff. So if no one is going to
> maintain GNUstep in official repos, we should drop oolite.
I'm going to drop oolite and remaining GNUstep
On 2018-01-09 13:04, LoneVVolf wrote:
> In the recent repo clean up operation gnustep-back was dropped to AUR.
>
> I have maintained the oolite package when it was still in AUR and
> remember plenty of problems with running oolite against faulty /
> incomplete gnustep-core implementations .
>
> T
In the recent repo clean up operation gnustep-back was dropped to AUR.
I have maintained the oolite package when it was still in AUR and
remember plenty of problems with running oolite against faulty /
incomplete gnustep-core implementations .
The gnustep upstream website [1] lists gnustep-ba
6 matches
Mail list logo
