On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 6:46 PM Levente Polyak via arch-general <
arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> On 2/12/20 12:58 AM, Genes Lists via arch-general wrote:
> > I've selected a few to highlight based on age and my own view of
> > importance (no claim its a good view).
> >
> > So, here's a few t
On 2/12/20 12:58 AM, Genes Lists via arch-general wrote:
> I've selected a few to highlight based on age and my own view of
> importance (no claim its a good view).
>
> So, here's a few that might benefit from an update:
>Cal Pkg
> NameVe
On Wednesday, 12 February 2020 14:13:02 EET Genes Lists via arch-general wrote:
> On 2/12/20 3:27 AM, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> > Be aware that packagers might be busy, have limited time or various
> > rebuilds need to happen. For samba for example there is an updated
> > version in [testing]. For
On 2/12/20 3:27 AM, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> Be aware that packagers might be busy, have limited time or various
> rebuilds need to happen. For samba for example there is an updated
> version in [testing]. For libelf, a rebuild is required which might make
> sense to wait until binutils has supp
Hey Jude,
On 2020-02-12 03:39:23 (-0500), Jude DaShiell wrote:
> tintin-alteraeon can be added to that list since it no longer builds.
this is the second time I've noticed you're bringing up AUR packages on
arch-general.
This mailing list is not about unsupported packages. If you would like
to d
ject: Re: [arch-general] A few out of date packages
>
> On 02/11/20 at 06:58pm, Genes Lists via arch-general wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Thank you again for all the great work managing and keeping
> > packages up to date. It is a significant amount of work and continues
> >
On 02/11/20 at 06:58pm, Genes Lists via arch-general wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thank you again for all the great work managing and keeping
> packages up to date. It is a significant amount of work and continues
> to make Arch a really standout distro.
>
> That said, periodically I check the repos for out o
Hi
Thank you again for all the great work managing and keeping
packages up to date. It is a significant amount of work and continues
to make Arch a really standout distro.
That said, periodically I check the repos for out of date packages.
I've selected a few to highlight based on age and my own
The refind update is probably easy to integrate. It's mostly just fixing
one bug with a workaround.
On Wed, May 22, 2019, 6:06 PM Genes Lists via arch-general <
arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> On 5/19/19 6:08 PM, Genes Lists via arch-general wrote:
>
>
> Firstly, a big thank you for those wh
On 5/19/19 6:08 PM, Genes Lists via arch-general wrote:
Firstly, a big thank you for those who updated their packages :)
(By the way, The age column is the number of days between the current
available release and the version we have in the repo. )
Given the work needed to explore possible use o
On 20.05.19 00:08, Genes Lists via arch-general wrote:
> Hi - First a thank you for all the great work managing and keeping
> packages up to date. It can a significant amount of work.
>
> That said, periodically I check the repos for out of date packages. I've
> selected a few to highlight based o
On 5/19/19 6:16 PM, Anatol Pomozov via arch-general wrote:
...
>> lsof4.91201804044.93.2 20190508399
>
> Where did you find lsof version 4.93.2?>
> The official website does not mention current version. And the mirror
> Arch uses hosts 4.91 only ftp://ftp.fu-berl
Hello
On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 3:08 PM Genes Lists via arch-general
wrote:
>
> Hi - First a thank you for all the great work managing and keeping
> packages up to date. It can a significant amount of work.
>
> That said, periodically I check the repos for out of date packages. I've
> selected a fe
Hi - First a thank you for all the great work managing and keeping
packages up to date. It can a significant amount of work.
That said, periodically I check the repos for out of date packages. I've
selected a few to highlight based on age and my own view of importance
(no claim its a good view).
14 matches
Mail list logo
