The 28/09/12, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> An option could be to enable moderation on dev-public, still defaulting to
> rejecting everything, but allow through high-quality contributions from the
> outside.
>
> I agree that we should create a venue for would-be contributors to engage
> with us, but i a
The 28/09/12, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> We have recently seen on this very mailing list that for every person
> posting considerate opinions, there are dozens who just pollute threads
> with fear, uncertainty, doubt, and just sheer incompetence.
I'm very confident that an open dev mailing list with
The 28/09/12, Allan McRae wrote:
> If all that crap went to arch-dev-public, I would have to unsubscribe
> there too.
What you're calling crap are all technical content that could gain with
direct emulation with official maintainers.
BTW, what a wonderfull attitude from you to non official peopl
The 27/09/12, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> > The 27/09/12, Tobias Frilling wrote:
> >
> > The problem is not at the general mailing list but at the dev mailing
> > list side.
>
> archlinux-dev is for contributors and as long somebody is just
The 27/09/12, Tobias Frilling wrote:
> IMHO the cause of all these flaming is that arch-general is too, well,
> general.
The problem is not that arch-general is the wrong place for the latter
threads. Users are correct to think such discussion should happen here.
The problem is that maintainers
5 matches
Mail list logo
