Re: [arch-general] [signoff] lvm2/device-mapper 2.02.82-1

2011-01-31 Thread Jan Spakula
Excerpts from Thomas Bächler's message of So Jan 30 21:45:28 +0100 2011: > Am 27.01.2011 14:30, schrieb Thomas Bächler: > > Am 27.01.2011 11:35, schrieb Jan Spakula: > >>> This is weird. I think lvm2 is supposed to wait for udev to finish > >>> creating all links before returning. Inserting a 'slee

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] lvm2/device-mapper 2.02.82-1

2011-01-31 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 31.01.2011 09:15, schrieb Jakob Gruber: > For some reason, I'm not getting this behavior anymore with > lvm2/device-mapper 2.02.82-1. > > I inserted the 'udevadm settle' line into rc.sysinit on the 26th as you > suggested (which fixed the issue). On the 27th, rc.sysinit was > overwritten by new

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] lvm2/device-mapper 2.02.82-1

2011-01-31 Thread Jakob Gruber
On 01/30/2011 09:45 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: Am 27.01.2011 14:30, schrieb Thomas Bächler: Am 27.01.2011 11:35, schrieb Jan Spakula: This is weird. I think lvm2 is supposed to wait for udev to finish creating all links before returning. Inserting a 'sleep 1' or '/sbin/udevadm settle' in rc.sysi

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] lvm2/device-mapper 2.02.82-1

2011-01-30 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 27.01.2011 14:30, schrieb Thomas Bächler: > Am 27.01.2011 11:35, schrieb Jan Spakula: >>> This is weird. I think lvm2 is supposed to wait for udev to finish >>> creating all links before returning. Inserting a 'sleep 1' or >>> '/sbin/udevadm settle' in rc.sysinit after the vgchange call should f

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] lvm2/device-mapper 2.02.82-1

2011-01-30 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 30.01.2011 20:07, schrieb Thomas Bächler: > Am 27.01.2011 14:30, schrieb Thomas Bächler: >> Am 27.01.2011 11:35, schrieb Jan Spakula: This is weird. I think lvm2 is supposed to wait for udev to finish creating all links before returning. Inserting a 'sleep 1' or '/sbin/udevadm set

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] lvm2/device-mapper 2.02.82-1

2011-01-30 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 27.01.2011 14:30, schrieb Thomas Bächler: > Am 27.01.2011 11:35, schrieb Jan Spakula: >>> This is weird. I think lvm2 is supposed to wait for udev to finish >>> creating all links before returning. Inserting a 'sleep 1' or >>> '/sbin/udevadm settle' in rc.sysinit after the vgchange call should f

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] lvm2/device-mapper 2.02.82-1

2011-01-27 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 27.01.2011 11:35, schrieb Jan Spakula: >> This is weird. I think lvm2 is supposed to wait for udev to finish >> creating all links before returning. Inserting a 'sleep 1' or >> '/sbin/udevadm settle' in rc.sysinit after the vgchange call should fix >> this, but it shouldn't be necessary. > > In

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] lvm2/device-mapper 2.02.82-1

2011-01-27 Thread Jan Spakula
Excerpts from Thomas Bächler's message of Mi Jan 26 16:29:43 +0100 2011: > Am 26.01.2011 11:38, schrieb Eric Bélanger: > > On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 3:33 AM, Jan Spakula wrote: > >> Excerpts from Eric Bélanger's message of Mi Jan 26 05:16:44 +0100 2011: > >>> lvm2/device-mapper 2.02.82-1 are in test

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] lvm2/device-mapper 2.02.82-1

2011-01-26 Thread Jakob Gruber
On 01/26/2011 04:29 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: Am 26.01.2011 11:38, schrieb Eric Bélanger: On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 3:33 AM, Jan Spakula wrote: Excerpts from Eric Bélanger's message of Mi Jan 26 05:16:44 +0100 2011: lvm2/device-mapper 2.02.82-1 are in testing for minor upstream update. Please

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] lvm2/device-mapper 2.02.82-1

2011-01-26 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 26.01.2011 11:38, schrieb Eric Bélanger: > On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 3:33 AM, Jan Spakula wrote: >> Excerpts from Eric Bélanger's message of Mi Jan 26 05:16:44 +0100 2011: >>> lvm2/device-mapper 2.02.82-1 are in testing for minor upstream update. >>> Please test and signoff. Users signoffs are

[arch-general] [signoff] lvm2/device-mapper 2.02.82-1

2011-01-25 Thread Eric Bélanger
Hi, lvm2/device-mapper 2.02.82-1 are in testing for minor upstream update. Please test and signoff. Users signoffs are welcome. Thanks Eric