On 08/21/2010 06:17 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 18:51 +0530, Madhurya Kakati wrote:
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Lauri Niskanen wrote:
On 08/21/2010 01:33 PM, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
noob question: what does this signoff means?
Basically it means that it works OK for you
On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 18:51 +0530, Madhurya Kakati wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Lauri Niskanen wrote:
> > On 08/21/2010 01:33 PM, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
> >>>
> >>> noob question: what does this signoff means?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Basically it means that it works OK for you and you are wil
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Lauri Niskanen wrote:
> On 08/21/2010 01:33 PM, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
>>>
>>> noob question: what does this signoff means?
>>>
>>
>> Basically it means that it works OK for you and you are willing to
>> "sign off the declaration the package is OK and can be moved
On 08/21/2010 01:33 PM, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
noob question: what does this signoff means?
Basically it means that it works OK for you and you are willing to
"sign off the declaration the package is OK and can be moved to
[core]." Usually it's not used for packages from [extra] or
[community
>
> noob question: what does this signoff means?
>
Basically it means that it works OK for you and you are willing to
"sign off the declaration the package is OK and can be moved to
[core]." Usually it's not used for packages from [extra] or
[community].
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 3:16 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Latest kernel is in testing,
> please signoff for both arches.
>
> greetings
> tpowa
> --
> Tobias
> Powalowski
> Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer
> (tpowa)
> http://www.archlinux.org
> tp...@archlinux.org
>
>
noob question: what
On 08/18/2010 02:03 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Am Mittwoch 18 August 2010 schrieb David C. Rankin:
On 08/18/2010 01:24 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
Call Trace:
[] usb_kill_urb+0x85/0xc0 [usbcore]
[] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40
[] usbhid_init_reports+0xb1/0x120 [usbhid]
Tobias
On 09:59 Tue 17 Aug , Dennis Beekman wrote:
> signoff here, works fine on both my desktop and my laptop (both i386)
>
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
>
> > Latest kernel is in testing,
> > please signoff for both arches.
> >
> > greetings
> > tpowa
> > --
> > Tobias
Tobias Powalowski (2010-08-18 21:03):
> Am Mittwoch 18 August 2010 schrieb David C. Rankin:
> > On 08/18/2010 01:24 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> > > Call Trace:
> > > [] usb_kill_urb+0x85/0xc0 [usbcore]
> > > [] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40
> > > [] usbhid_init_reports+0xb1/0x120 [usbh
Am Mittwoch 18 August 2010 schrieb David C. Rankin:
> On 08/18/2010 01:24 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> > Call Trace:
> > [] usb_kill_urb+0x85/0xc0 [usbcore]
> > [] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40
> > [] usbhid_init_reports+0xb1/0x120 [usbhid]
>
> Tobias,
>
> I'm sure you know, but
On 08/18/2010 01:24 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
Call Trace:
[] usb_kill_urb+0x85/0xc0 [usbcore]
[] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40
[] usbhid_init_reports+0xb1/0x120 [usbhid]
Tobias,
I'm sure you know, but 'usbhid' is the network-ups-tools driver.
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
On 08/14/2010 04:46 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Latest kernel is in testing,
please signoff for both arches.
greetings
tpowa
Tobias,
I updated the box that 2.6.34.3 fails to boot do to dmraid problems
(http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/20499) to 2.6.35.2-1 and the box boots with
dmraid ju
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Dennis Beekman
wrote:
> signoff here, works fine on both my desktop and my laptop (both i386)
No problems here either, on three machines (two x86_64 and one i686).
On 08/15/10 16:57, Isaac Dupree wrote:
On 08/15/10 13:07, Isaac Dupree wrote:
On 08/14/10 17:46, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Latest kernel is in testing,
please signoff for both arches.
Signoff x86_64 , it seems to be working fine for me
Also, I think the ath9k regressions (randomly losing the
signoff here, works fine on both my desktop and my laptop (both i386)
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Latest kernel is in testing,
> please signoff for both arches.
>
> greetings
> tpowa
> --
> Tobias
> Powalowski
> Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer
> (tpowa)
Le 15/08/2010 23:45, David C. Rankin a écrit :
The kicker is temp issues are hard to chase down. Something is putting
more demand on the processor in the 2.6.35 setup, but what??
Be sure to test with kernel 2.6.35.2, not previous releases.
This patch [1] may reduce CPU wakeups from 2.6.35.1.
On 08/17/2010 02:50 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:
Good point on power consumption. I'll see if I can find powertop in
AUR. The instrumentation on my laptop sucks - few sensors, but my best
sensors are my hands. The CPU and GPU are located in the left side of
my laptop and you can feel the temp ch
On 08/15/2010 06:46 PM, Isaac Dupree wrote:
Actually, my fan mostly didn't speed up, instead the temp (if this is real) got
hotter, so I manually adjusted it up a bit (via some macbook-fan-specific
mechanism), but maybe it's the same thing (macbook linux are long known to run
the fan a little slo
I also noticed that kernel 2.6.35 wake the fan in my notebook more often.
watching sensors output, the fan wakes when temp reached 52°C, then cooled
down to 45°C in 30 secs, then fan stops, and the temp soon go up to 50+ in
another 30 secs.
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Isaac Dupree <
m...@i
On 08/15/10 17:45, David C. Rankin wrote:
What type of video card do you have?
Intel 945 class -- it's one of the first to get KMS and the support is
excellent by now. I never ever get slow graphics (although I don't play
games much... IIRC extremetuxracer works fine...)
If you can identi
On 08/15/2010 12:07 PM, Isaac Dupree wrote:
On 08/14/10 17:46, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Latest kernel is in testing,
please signoff for both arches.
Signoff x86_64 , it seems to be working fine for me
(I had the impression that it might be heating up my laptop more than normal,
but then I was
On 08/15/10 13:07, Isaac Dupree wrote:
On 08/14/10 17:46, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Latest kernel is in testing,
please signoff for both arches.
Signoff x86_64 , it seems to be working fine for me
Also, I think the ath9k regressions (randomly losing the wireless
connection) that .33 and .34
On 08/14/10 17:46, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Latest kernel is in testing,
please signoff for both arches.
Signoff x86_64 , it seems to be working fine for me
(I had the impression that it might be heating up my laptop more than
normal, but then I was doing backups last night, and I'm feeling a
On 08/15/2010 12:46 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Latest kernel is in testing,
please signoff for both arches.
greetings
tpowa
signoff x86_64
--
Ionuț
Latest kernel is in testing,
please signoff for both arches.
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias
Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer
(tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tp...@archlinux.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
25 matches
Mail list logo
