Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.33.3-1

2010-04-27 Thread Ignacio Galmarino
On 04/27/2010 06:54 AM, Ray Kohler wrote: On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: Am 26.04.2010 23:08, schrieb Ray Kohler: The existing nouveau-drm module does not load into this kernel: 2010-04-26T16:51:01-04:00 amaranth kernel: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL poi

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.33.3-1

2010-04-27 Thread Ray Kohler
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 26.04.2010 23:08, schrieb Ray Kohler: >> The existing nouveau-drm module does not load into this kernel: >> >> 2010-04-26T16:51:01-04:00 amaranth kernel: BUG: unable to >> handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0060 >> >>

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.33.3-1

2010-04-27 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 26.04.2010 23:08, schrieb Ray Kohler: > The existing nouveau-drm module does not load into this kernel: > > 2010-04-26T16:51:01-04:00 amaranth kernel: BUG: unable to > handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0060 > > Rebuilding nouveau-drm fixes it for me (x86_64). > Uploaded

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.33.3-1

2010-04-26 Thread Ray Kohler
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > This is an upstream kernel release, including security fixes. Packages > will enter testing within the next hour. > > We had a gcc 4.4 -> 4.5 version bump, so the external modules are still > compiled with 4.4, while the kernel is compiled w

[arch-general] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.33.3-1

2010-04-26 Thread Thomas Bächler
This is an upstream kernel release, including security fixes. Packages will enter testing within the next hour. We had a gcc 4.4 -> 4.5 version bump, so the external modules are still compiled with 4.4, while the kernel is compiled with 4.5. If any external modules break (usual candidates are nvid