Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-2

2011-03-26 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Am Samstag 26 März 2011 schrieb Evangelos Foutras: > On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > > Am 26.03.2011 15:58, schrieb Damjan: > >>> Are the i915 issues fixed with 38.1 from testing? > >> > >> no, but it seems Chris Wilson has found the issue. > >> I guess 38.2 will have th

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-2

2011-03-26 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 26.03.2011 15:58, schrieb Damjan: >>> Are the i915 issues fixed with 38.1 from testing? >> >> no, but it seems Chris Wilson has found the issue. >> I guess 38.2 will have the patch. > > Are you sure? .38.2 review is already in progress. I

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-2

2011-03-26 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 26.03.2011 15:58, schrieb Damjan: >> Are the i915 issues fixed with 38.1 from testing? > > no, but it seems Chris Wilson has found the issue. > I guess 38.2 will have the patch. Are you sure? .38.2 review is already in progress. If you could send us a link to the patch, we could integrate it a

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-2

2011-03-26 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Am Samstag 26 März 2011 schrieb Damjan: > >>> corresponding kernel bugzilla entries: > >>> i915 problems: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27572 > >>> ath9k problems: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31452 > >> > >> FYI: > >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/20

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-2

2011-03-26 Thread Damjan
>>> corresponding kernel bugzilla entries: >>> i915 problems: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27572 >>> ath9k problems: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31452 >> >> FYI: >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2011-March/009741.html > Are the i915 issues fixed wit

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-2

2011-03-25 Thread Sergey Manucharian
Excerpts from Tobias Powalowski's message from Fri 25-Mar-11 20:35: > Am Mittwoch 23 März 2011 schrieb Sander Jansen: > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Richard Schütz > wrote: > > > Am 22.03.2011 17:27, schrieb Richard Schütz: > > > . > > > I noticed that new X packages hit [testing] and

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-2

2011-03-25 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Am Mittwoch 23 März 2011 schrieb Sander Jansen: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Richard Schütz wrote: > > Am 22.03.2011 17:27, schrieb Richard Schütz: > >> Am 22.03.2011 15:31, schrieb Tobias Powalowski: > >>> Hi guys, > >>> please signoff 2.6.38 series for both arches. > >>> > >>> Upstream

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-2

2011-03-24 Thread Bogdan
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 14:10, Bernardo Barros wrote: > 2.6.38.1 is out :-) > it's already in [testing], but ATM seems like patch-2.6.38.1-1-ARCH.bz2 is still missing from ftp://ftp.archlinux.org/other/kernel26/ :-(

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-2

2011-03-24 Thread Bernardo Barros
2.6.38.1 is out :-)

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-2

2011-03-23 Thread Sander Jansen
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Richard Schütz wrote: > Am 22.03.2011 17:27, schrieb Richard Schütz: >> >> Am 22.03.2011 15:31, schrieb Tobias Powalowski: >>> >>> Hi guys, >>> please signoff 2.6.38 series for both arches. >>> >>> Upstream >>> changes: >>> http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges >>

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-2

2011-03-22 Thread Dieter Plaetinck
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 16:40:58 +0100 Thomas Bächler wrote: > We used to have lots of patches in the kernel (between 5 and 15), so a > single -ARCH patch was created. > Now, the number of patches is fairly small and I am thinking maybe we > should go back to single patches. > > Optimally, we could

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-2

2011-03-22 Thread Richard Schütz
Am 22.03.2011 17:27, schrieb Richard Schütz: Am 22.03.2011 15:31, schrieb Tobias Powalowski: Hi guys, please signoff 2.6.38 series for both arches. Upstream changes: http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges Features included: - latest stable patches - disabled /dev/kmem - added AMD_IOMMU support

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-2

2011-03-22 Thread Richard Schütz
Am 22.03.2011 15:31, schrieb Tobias Powalowski: Hi guys, please signoff 2.6.38 series for both arches. Upstream changes: http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges Features included: - latest stable patches - disabled /dev/kmem - added AMD_IOMMU support - kernel image is now xz compressed - NUMA is

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-2

2011-03-22 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 22.03.2011 16:14, schrieb Damjan: >> please signoff 2.6.38 series for both arches. > >> Features included: >> - latest stable patches > > a bit offtopic, > is there a special reason why there's a single big patch for the kernel, > and at that one that's not versioned with the kernel package. >

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-2

2011-03-22 Thread C Anthony Risinger
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Damjan wrote: >> please signoff 2.6.38 series for both arches. > >> Features included: >> - latest stable patches > > a bit offtopic, > is there a special reason why there's a single big patch for the kernel, > and at that one that's not versioned with the kernel

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-2

2011-03-22 Thread Damjan
> please signoff 2.6.38 series for both arches. > Features included: > - latest stable patches a bit offtopic, is there a special reason why there's a single big patch for the kernel, and at that one that's not versioned with the kernel package. A broken up patch would be much easier to analyze

[arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-2

2011-03-22 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Hi guys, please signoff 2.6.38 series for both arches. Upstream changes: http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges Features included: - latest stable patches - disabled /dev/kmem - added AMD_IOMMU support - kernel image is now xz compressed - NUMA is enabled on x86_64 - AUTOSCHED (aka the wonder patc