2012/10/13 Jayesh Badwaik :
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 11:29 AM, fredbezies wrote:
>
>> Well, I will tell this again : NOT A SINGLE screenshot. Clear ? ;)
>>
>> Okay! (Sorry.)
> :-)
>
> --
> Jayesh
Well... Looks like it is a gnome 3.4 issue. "Upgraded" to
gnome-unstable, and guess what ? PrintScre
2012/10/13 Jayesh Badwaik :
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 11:29 AM, fredbezies wrote:
>
>> Well, I will tell this again : NOT A SINGLE screenshot. Clear ? ;)
>>
>> Okay! (Sorry.)
> :-)
>
> --
> Jayesh
No problems. This "bug" is just very annoying for everyday use.
--
Frederic Bezies
fredbez...@gmai
2012/10/13 Jayesh Badwaik :
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 11:16 AM, fredbezies wrote:
>
>> In some way, yes. But I didn't try shutter. Same behaviour.
>>
>>
> What I meant was, probably the screenshots are getting saved? Even though
> there is no dialog? As is written there in a link in the comments?
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 11:16 AM, fredbezies wrote:
> In some way, yes. But I didn't try shutter. Same behaviour.
>
>
What I meant was, probably the screenshots are getting saved? Even though
there is no dialog? As is written there in a link in the comments?
--
Jayesh
2012/10/13 Jayesh Badwaik :
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 11:09 AM, fredbezies wrote:
>
>> First log I looked at. Nothing is stored. Nothing in /var/log/errors.log
>> too.
>>
>> Dmesg | tail ? Nothing.
>> /var/log/everything.log ? Nothing
>>
>> This is really "dumb" and quiet. Far too quiet.
>>
>>
> J
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 11:09 AM, fredbezies wrote:
> First log I looked at. Nothing is stored. Nothing in /var/log/errors.log
> too.
>
> Dmesg | tail ? Nothing.
> /var/log/everything.log ? Nothing
>
> This is really "dumb" and quiet. Far too quiet.
>
>
Just out of curiosity, may be the situation
2012/10/12 Rodrigo Rivas :
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:42 PM, fredbezies wrote:
>
[...]
>
> Did you check the .xsession-errors file for any hint? Run:
>
> $ tail -f ~/.xsession-errors
>
> And then press the PrintScreen key to see if anything is logged.
>
> --
> Rodrigo
First log I looked at. Not
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:42 PM, fredbezies wrote:
> 2012/10/12 Rodrigo Rivas :
> > On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:15 AM, fredbezies
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello.
> >>
> >> I'm searching some help, because I'm really stuck. I'm facing a weird
> >> - I mean a very weird one - problem since I reinstalled
Le vendredi 12 octobre 2012 13:02:35 fredbezies a écrit :
> It is recognized by the kernel.
>
> keycode 99 pressed
> keycode 99 released
>
> when I press the PrintScreen key.
>
> With Xev :
>
> 107 Print
> 107 Print
> 107 Print
> 107 Print
> 107 Print
>
> The weird part is that PrintScreen is recog
2012/10/12 Jayesh Badwaik :
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 4:12 PM, fredbezies wrote:
>
>> It is like the key is dead. But it is not a keyboard problem, same
>> thing happens with another keyboard.
>>
>> Use the showkey to determine, if the key is being determined by the kernel
> when pressed. If it is
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 4:12 PM, fredbezies wrote:
> It is like the key is dead. But it is not a keyboard problem, same
> thing happens with another keyboard.
>
> Use the showkey to determine, if the key is being determined by the kernel
when pressed. If it is being determined, then probably it i
2012/10/12 Rodrigo Rivas :
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:15 AM, fredbezies wrote:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> I'm searching some help, because I'm really stuck. I'm facing a weird
>> - I mean a very weird one - problem since I reinstalled from scratch a
>> few days ago my computer.
>>
>> Ok. I'm using archli
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:15 AM, fredbezies wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'm searching some help, because I'm really stuck. I'm facing a weird
> - I mean a very weird one - problem since I reinstalled from scratch a
> few days ago my computer.
>
> Ok. I'm using archlinux + gnome 3 with testing repo enabl
13 matches
Mail list logo
